David C. Twichell VeeAnn A. Cross 2004 vector digital data Open-File Report 2004-1014 Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA U.S. Geological Survey, Coastal and Marine Geology Program https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20041014 https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1014/htmldocs/metadata.htm VeeAnn A. Cross David C. Twichell 2004 Open-File Report 2004-1014 Reston, VA U.S. Geological Survey https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1014/ A two-week field operation was conducted in the John Day Reservoir on the Columbia River to image the floor of the pool, to measure the distribution and thickness of post-impoundment sediment, and to verify these geophysical data with video photography and bottom sediment samples. The field program was a cooperative effort between the USGS Coastal and Marine Geology Team of the Geologic Division and the USGS Columbia River Research Laboratory of the Biological Resources Division. The data collection was completed aboard the R/V ESTERO during September 13-27, 2000. The interest in sediment accumulation in the reservoir was two-fold. First, it was unknown how effective this reservoir was as a sediment trap to material that otherwise would have been transported down-river to the estuary and eventually to the ocean. The recent erosion of beaches along the Washington coast has been attributed to a decreased contribution of sediment from the Columbia River to the coastal system due to the damming of the river. Second, sediment accumulation on the floors of reservoirs along the Columbia River has been suggested to be diminishing salmon spawning grounds. The extent of changes in habitat since construction of the John Day Dam, however, had not been documented. Common data sets were needed to address both of these questions, and for these reasons this geophysical and sampling program was undertaken. This shapefile is intended to provide information as to what the floor of the John Day Reservoir looks like. For more information about the field activity, see https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=2000-030-FA. 20020418 20020424 ground condition Complete None planned -119.813167 -119.376450 45.923000 45.843100 USGS Metadata Identifier USGS:ddf287e3-5652-4e05-a9fb-35b9230b9e4c None ArcView CMGP Coastal and Marine Geology Program grab sample images lake OF 2004-1014 Open-File Report point reservoir sediment sediment sample shapefile U.S. Geological Survey USGS Woods Hole Science Center USGS Thesaurus grain-size analysis navigational data geospatial datasets lakebed characteristics geology None Columbia River John Day Dam John Day Reservoir Lake Umatilla North America Oregon United States Washington None. The U.S. Geological Survey must be referenced as the originator of the dataset in any future products or research derived from these data. David C. Twichell U.S. Geological Survey Oceanographer mailing and physical address

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 (508) 548-8700 x2266 (508) 457-2310 dtwichell@usgs.gov Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 4; ESRI ArcCatalog 8.2.0.700 All sample locations were treated the same. Represents all the locations where a bottom sample was recovered. The navigational system has an accuracy better than 10m, but because the data acquisition system was towed, this reduces the navigational accuracy. Assumed accruacy is 10 meters. Video imagery of the floor of the John Day Reservoir was collected using a system developed by the USGS in Cook, WA. This system was patterned after the SeaBOSS system in Woods Hole, MA. They system used a Van Veen grab sampler, and had a video camera mounted on the frame. unknown The VHS tapes from this cruise were displayed on a flat-screen monitor and photographs were taken of theonitor using a Nikon Coolpix-5000 digital camera. It was attempted to take the picture near the time when the sediment sample was actually acquired, but this was not always possible. The only navigation available for these data were the actual sample points, so the imagery is located near, but not exactly where the navigational fixes are. unknown These digital photographs were imported to Corel PHOTO-PAINT version 11 where the images were cropped, converted to black and white images, and enhanced to improve image contrast. unknown This information was gleaned from an email message in 2003 from Laura Landerman (at the time working for the U.S. Geological Survey office in Cook, Washington) to VeeAnn Cross. This information was incorporated into the metadata on 12/6/2017 by VeeAnn. The original metadata did not address the analyses of the sediment samples at all. The samples collected in the John Day Reservoir were incredibly varied. Video of the bottom showed many areas consisted of gravel (granules to large boulders) covered with varying thicknesses of finer sediments ranging in size from silt to sand. The samples collected sometimes included cobble from the bottom. Sample sizes were not large enough to actually quantify the distribution of the larger material; therefore, only the sand or finer material which was collected in each sample (if any) was analyzed for its grain size distribution. In some instances some of the slightly larger material was noted in more detail, otherwise the grain size analysis focuses on material approximately 2mm (-1 phi) or smaller. Samples were prepared according to standard USGS Coastal and Marine Geology procedures (USGS CMG), modified from Folk (1968) and Carver (1971; chapter 4). Samples were wet sieved at 2mm (-1 phi) and 1mm (0 phi) and weights were recorded. If the 1mm - 2mm fraction was greater than 0.00g the samples were again wet sieved at 63 micons (4 phi) and the sand fraction (63 microns to 2 mm) were run through settling tubes and the fine fraction (smaller than 63 microns) were analyzed with the Coulter LS Particle Size Analyzer (Coulter, 1994). Otherwise, the 1mm and finer sample was analyzed using the Coulter LS Particle Size Analyzer Coulter). The USGS CMG settling tubes are modified after Thiede et al., (1976), and similar to that described by Syvitski, (1991; chapters 1 and 4). The Coulter uses laser diffraction theory to analyze particle sizes up to 1mm. Statistical analyses of the results were obtained using a USGS-developed computer program. The program calculates graphical statistics, median, mean, skewness, and kurtosis, using methods presented by Folk and Ward, Inman (Carver,1971; chapter 6), and Trask (1930), and the moment measures (Carver, 1971; chapter 6). References: Carver, R.E., 1971, Procedures in Sedimentary Petrology, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 653pp. Coulter Corporation, 1994, Coulter Product Manual, May, 1994, Coulter Corp., Miani, FL. Folk, R. L., 1968, Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks: Austin, University of Texas Publication, 170 p. Syvitski, J.P.M., 1991, Principles, Methods, and Application of Particle Size Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 368 pp. Thiede, J., T. Chriss, M. Clausson, and S. A. Swift, 1976, Settling Tubes for Size Analysis of Fine and Coarse Fractions of Oceanic Sediments, School of Oceanography, Oregon State University, Report#76-8, 87 pp. Trask, P. D., 1930, Mechanical analysis of sediments by centrifuge, Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists, 25, no. 6, pp. 581-599. sdsz A Program for Sediment Size Analysis by Graig McHendrie documentation by Carol Madison and Graig McHendrie U.S. Geological Survey Menlo Park, CA July 12, 1989 Version 3.3 34p. unknown Edits to the metadata were made to fix any errors that MP v 2.9.36 flagged. This is necessary to enable the metadata to be successfully harvested for various data catalogs. In some cases, this meant adding text "Information unavailable" or "Information unavailable from original metadata" for those required fields that were left blank. Other minor edits were probably performed (title, publisher, publication place, etc.). Added the link to the data catalog page in the Identification section, and a link to the publication in the Larger Work Citation. Added online link to the data in the Distribution section. Added a link to the field activity. The information in the quantitative horizontal accuracy assessment was moved to the horizontal positional accuracy report. A process step was added to account for the sediment sample analysis. The metadata date (but not the metadata creator) was edited to reflect the date of these changes. The metadata available from a harvester may supersede metadata bundled within a download file. Compare the metadata dates to determine which metadata file is most recent. 20171206 U.S. Geological Survey VeeAnn A. Cross Marine Geologist Mailing and Physical

384 Woods Hole Road

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2251 508-457-2310 vatnipp@usgs.gov USGS Thesaurus keywords added to the keyword section. 20180720 U.S. Geological Survey VeeAnn A. Cross Marine Geologist Mailing and Physical

384 Woods Hole Road

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2251 508-457-2310 vatnipp@usgs.gov Crossref DOI link was added as the first link in the metadata. 20191118 U.S. Geological Survey VeeAnn A. Cross Marine Geologist Mailing and Physical

384 Woods Hole Road

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2251 508-457-2310 vatnipp@usgs.gov Added keywords section with USGS persistent identifier as theme keyword. 20200908 U.S. Geological Survey VeeAnn A. Cross Marine Geologist Mailing and Physical

384 Woods Hole Road

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2251 508-457-2310 vatnipp@usgs.gov Point Entity point 47 0.000001 0.000001 Decimal degrees North American Datum of 1983 Geodetic Reference System 80 6378137.000000 298.257222 jd2002_anal Information unavailable from original metadata. Information unavailable from original metadata. FID Internal feature number. ESRI Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated. Shape Feature geometry. ESRI Coordinates defining the features. SAMPLE_ID Identification representing the sediment sample number. USGS - Cook, WA. character set LATITUDE Latitude fix for the location of the sediment sample. Software generated. 45.843100 45.923000 decimal degrees LONGITUDE Longitude fix for the location of the sediment sample. Software generated. -119.813167 -119.376450 decimal degrees DEPTH_M Water depth where the sample was acquired. Software generated. 3 31 meters DESCRIPTIO Description of the video image. Dave Twichell character set IMAGE Prefix portion of the name of the image. Dave Twichell character set WT_G_ Weight of sample in grams. Scientist 13.9435 957.31 grams SAND Percentage of sand in sample scientist 0 7 percent GRVL Percentage of gravel in sample Scientist 0 100 percent SILT Percentage of silt in sample Scientist 0 8 percent CLAY Percentage of clay in sample Scientist 0 9 percent TOTAL Sum of the percentages of sand, silt, clay, and gravel Scientist 100 percent Information unavailable from original metadata. CLASS Lithologic classification of the sediments. Based on Folk, 1980. character set MEDIAN Median of the grain size distribution Scientist -5.5 6.55 phi MEAN Mean of the grain size distribution Scientist -5.5 6.45 phi STDEV Standard deviation of the grain size distribution Scientist -0.08 4.62 phi SKEW Skewness of the grain size distribution Scientist -4217 123907.67 KURT Kurtosis of the grain size distribution Scientist -448707.94 63283403.04 M1PHI First mode (particle size that occurs the most number of times) in phi units Scientist -5.5 3.5 phi M1FRQ Modal strength of the first mode in percent. Scientist 0 100 percent M2PHI Second mode in phi units Scientist 0 9 phi M2FRQ Modal strength of the second mode in percent Scientist 0 9 percent M3PHI Third mode in phi units Scientist 0 6 phi M3FRQ Modal strength of the third mode in percent Scientist 0 8 percent MODES Number of modes Scientist 0 3 CFP11 Cumulative frequency of the 11 phi fraction Scientist 100 percent Information unavailable from original metadata. CFP10 Cumulative frequency of the 10 phi fraction Scientist 97 100 percent CFP9 Cumulative frequency of the 9 phi fraction Scientist 86 100 percent CFP8 Cumulative frequency of the 8 phi fraction Scientist 70 100 percent CFP7 Cumulative frequency of the 7 phi fraction Scientist 54 100 percent CFP6 Cumulative frequency of the 6 phi fraction Scientist 45 100 percent CFP5 Cumulative frequency of the 5 phi fraction Scientist 32 100 percent CFP4 Cumulative frequency of the 4 phi fraction Scientist 20 100 percent CFP3 Cumulative frequency of the 3 phi fraction Scientist 1 100 percent CFP2 Cumulative frequency of the 2 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent CFP1 Cumulative frequency of the 1 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent CFP0 Cumulative frequency of the 0 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent CFPM1 Cumulative frequency of the minus 1 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent CFPM2 Cumulative frequency of the minus 2 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent CFPM3 Cumulative frequency of the minus 3 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent CFPM4 Cumulative frequency of the minus 4 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent CFPM5 Cumulative frequency of the minus 5 phi fraction Scientist 0 100 percent FP11 Frequency percent of the sample in the 11 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.5 microns, but less than 0.001 mm Scientist 0 3 percent FP10 Frequency percent of the sample in the 10 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.001 mm, but less than 0.002 mm; clay Scientist 0 6 percent FP9 Frequency percent of the sample in the 9 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.002 mm, but less than 0.004 mm; clay Scientist 0 9 percent FP8 Frequency percent of the sample in the 8 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.004 mm, but less than 0.008 mm; very fine silt Scientist 0 9 percent FP7 Frequency percent of the sample in the 7 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.008 mm, but less than 0.016 mm; fine silt Scientist 0 8 percent FP6 Frequency percent of the sample in the 6 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.016 mm, but less than 0.031 mm; medium silt Scientist 0 7 percent FP5 Frequency percent of the sample in the 5 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.031 mm, but less than 0.0625 mm; coarse silt Scientist 0 9 percent FP4 Frequency percent of the sample in the 4 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.0625 mm, but less than 0.125 mm; very fine sand Scientist 0 9 percent FP3 Frequency percent of the sample in the 3 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.125 mm, but less than 0.25 mm; fine sand Scientist 0 6 percent FP2 Frequency percent of the sample in the 2 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.25 mm, but less than 0.5 mm; medium sand Scientist 0 8 percent FP1 Frequency percent of the sample in the 1 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 0.5 mm, but less than 1 mm; coarse sand Scientist 0 2 percent FP0 Frequency percent of the sample in the 0 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 1 mm, but less than 2 mm; very coarse sand Scientist 0 5 percent FPM1 Frequency percent of the sample in the -1 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 2 mm, but less than 4 mm; very fine pebbles Scientist 0 8 percent FPM2 Frequency percent of the sample in the -2 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 4 mm, but less than 8 mm; fine pebbles Scientist 0 7.85 percent FPM3 Frequency percent of the sample in the -3 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 8 mm, but less than 16 mm; medium pebbles Scientist 0 39.32 percent FPM4 Frequency percent of the sample in the -4 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 16 mm, but less than 32 mm; coarse pebbles Scientist 0 100 percent FPM5 Frequency percent of the sample in the -5 phi fraction (nominal diameter of particles greater than or equal to 32 mm, but less than 64 mm; very coarse pebbles Scientist 0 100 percent HOTLINK Path indicating where an image corresponding to this location can be hotlinked to this point. This path contains an environment variable specifying the root directory of the project. Data processor. character set AQ_DATE Date the bottom sample was acquired. Scientist. character set David C. Twichell U.S. Geological Survey Oceanographer mailing and physical address

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 (508) 548-8700 x2266 (508) 457-2310 dtwichell@usgs.gov Downloadable Data These data were prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. Any views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Although all data published in this report have been used by the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS as to the accuracy of the data and related materials and/or the functioning of the software. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the USGS in the use of this data, software, or related materials. SHAPEFILE Zip file contains the data. 0.062 https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1014/data/samples/jd2002_anal.zip none 20240318 VeeAnn A. Cross U.S. Geological Survey Marine Geologist mailing and physical address

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 (508) 548-8700 x2251 (508) 457-2310 whsc_data_contact@usgs.gov The metadata contact email address is a generic address in the event the person is no longer with USGS. (updated on 20240318) FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998 local time