<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="fgdc_classic.xsl"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="https://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/fgdc-std-001-1998.xsd">
  <idinfo>
    <citation>
      <citeinfo>
        <origin>Adam G. Johnson</origin>
        <origin>Stephen B. Gingerich</origin>
        <pubdate>20170401</pubdate>
        <title>Monthly Water-Budget Components for Roi-Namur, Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands, 2000-12</title>
        <geoform>Vector Digital Data Set (Polygon)</geoform>
        <pubinfo>
          <pubplace>Reston, Virginia</pubplace>
          <publish>U.S. Geological Survey</publish>
        </pubinfo>
        <onlink>https://doi.org/10.5066/F7GM85H0</onlink>
        <lworkcit>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Stephen B. Gingerich</origin>
            <origin>Clifford I. Voss</origin>
            <origin>Adam G. Johnson</origin>
            <pubdate>2017</pubdate>
            <title>Seawater-flooding events and impact on freshwater lenses of low-lying islands: controlling factors, basic management and mitigation</title>
            <geoform>Publication (Journal)</geoform>
            <serinfo>
              <sername>Journal of Hydrology</sername>
              <issue>vol</issue>
            </serinfo>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>Philadelphia, Pennsylvania</pubplace>
              <publish>Elsevier</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>http://doi.org/10.5066/F7736P3Q</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </lworkcit>
      </citeinfo>
    </citation>
    <descript>
      <abstract>The zipped folder (Monthly_water_budget_Roi-Namur_2000-12.zip) associated with this metadata file contains 
156 polygon shapefiles. Collectively, the 156 shapefiles contain spatially distributed estimates of 
groundwater recharge and other water-budget components, in inches, for Roi-Namur, Kwajalein Atoll, 
Republic of the Marshall Islands, for each month and year during 2000–12. The name of each shapefile 
indicates the year and month of the water-budget components contained in the shapefile. 
		
The month-year estimates of recharge and other water-budget components summarized in each shapefile 
were summed from daily water-budget components that were computed using a water-budget model. The 
equations of the water-budget model that we used for Roi-Namur were the same as those (equations 1–16) 
described in Johnson and others (2014). Johnson and others (2014), available at 
(https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2014/5168/) and hereinafter U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 
(USGS SIR) 2014-5168, describes a water-budget model used for the island of Maui, Hawaii. In USGS 
SIR 2014-5168, the “Conceptual Model” section has a general description of the water-budget model, and the 
“Model Calculations” section has a detailed description of the equations and variables used in the model. 
Several water-budget components considered in the Hawaii water-budget model described in USGS 
SIR 2014-5168 were excluded from the water-budget model for Roi-Namur. Fog interception and irrigation 
were excluded because they were assumed to be negligible. Water leakage from water-storage tanks was 
excluded because leakage rates were not known (Chugach Management Services, Inc., written communication, 
2014). Water leakage from the rain water-catchment basins and water-transmission systems also was excluded. 
According to a soil database published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service (2014), soils on islands of nearby atolls (Maloelap, Aur, Majuro, Arno, and Mili) have “very low to negligible 
runoff.” Although this soil database does not have soil information for islands of Kwajalein Atoll, we assumed soil 
properties for Roi-Namur were similar to those on islands of nearby atolls. Therefore, runoff to the ocean from all 
surfaces was excluded because it was assumed to be negligible owing to the island’s porous soil. Runoff from 
impervious surfaces, however, was quantified in the model as “excess water” that was assumed to either be 
captured by catchment systems for storage or flow to pervious surfaces.  
			
This abstract and the attribute definitions in this metadata file have descriptions of the input data we used in the 
model for Roi-Namur. Prior to computing recharge, we subdivided the island of Roi-Namur into 68 polygons, which 
we refer to as subareas, and which are represented in each shapefile. An explanation of the methods used to 
create the subareas is included in this metadata file in the description for the Subarea_ID attribute. The 
water-budget model computed daily groundwater recharge and other water-budget components separately 
for each of the 68 subareas. The attributes associated with each polygon include monthly estimates of rainfall, 
forest-canopy evaporation, rain water captured from the airport runway, surplus rainfall-catchment water 
discharged to the ground near the airport runway, potential evapotranspiration, actual evapotranspiration, total 
evapotranspiration, natural recharge from rainfall, artificial recharge from surplus rainfall-catchment water, and 
total recharge.  For each attribute, this metadata file includes a description of how it was estimated in the 
water-budget model.</abstract>
      <purpose>The water-budget components in each shapefile were determined as part of an analysis to estimate the 
spatial and temporal distribution of groundwater recharge on Roi-Namur, for historic conditions (2000–12). 
The recharge estimates may be used in numerical groundwater models that can evaluate the effects of 
groundwater withdrawals seawater intrusion, and seawater flooding on groundwater levels, coastal discharge, 
and salinities in wells on Roi-Namur.</purpose>
      <supplinf>The name of each shapefile indicates the month and year of the water-budget components contained in the shapefile:
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2000.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2001_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2001.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2002_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2002.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2003_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2003.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2004_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2004.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2005_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2005.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2006_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2006.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2007_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2007.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2008_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2008.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2009_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2009.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2010_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2010.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2011_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2011.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_01.shp" contains the water-budget components for January 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_02.shp" contains the water-budget components for February 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_03.shp" contains the water-budget components for March 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_04.shp" contains the water-budget components for April 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_05.shp" contains the water-budget components for May 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_06.shp" contains the water-budget components for June 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_07.shp" contains the water-budget components for July 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_08.shp" contains the water-budget components for August 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_09.shp" contains the water-budget components for September 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_10.shp" contains the water-budget components for October 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_11.shp" contains the water-budget components for November 2012.
"Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2012_12.shp" contains the water-budget components for December 2012.</supplinf>
    </descript>
    <timeperd>
      <timeinfo>
        <rngdates>
          <begdate>20000101</begdate>
          <enddate>20121231</enddate>
        </rngdates>
      </timeinfo>
      <current>2017</current>
    </timeperd>
    <status>
      <progress>Complete</progress>
      <update>None planned</update>
    </status>
    <spdom>
      <bounding>
        <westbc>167.464568677</westbc>
        <eastbc>167.486070937</eastbc>
        <northbc>9.402748725</northbc>
        <southbc>9.389293494</southbc>
      </bounding>
    </spdom>
    <keywords>
      <theme>
        <themekt>USGS Thesaurus</themekt>
        <themekey>precipitation (atmospheric)</themekey>
        <themekey>evaporation</themekey>
        <themekey>transpiration</themekey>
        <themekey>water budget</themekey>
        <themekey>recharge</themekey>
        <themekey>inlandWaters</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>ISO 19115 Topic Category</themekt>
        <themekey>geoscientificInformation</themekey>
        <themekey>inlandWaters</themekey>
        <themekey>environment</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>USGS Metadata Identifier</themekt>
        <themekey>USGS:d86b6ac9-c28e-43ea-a854-9d573b1b781d</themekey>
      </theme>
       <place>
        <placekt>Geographic Names Information System</placekt>
        <placekey>Marshall Islands</placekey>
        <placekey>Kwajalein</placekey>
        <placekey>Roi-Namur</placekey>
      </place>
    </keywords>
    <accconst>None. Please see 'Distribution Info' for details.</accconst>
    <useconst>None. Users are advised to read the data set's metadata thoroughly to understand appropriate use and data limitations.</useconst>
    <ptcontac>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntorgp>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Islands Water Science Center</cntorg>
          <cntper>Adam G Johnson</cntper>
        </cntorgp>
        <cntpos>Hydrologist</cntpos>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
          <address>Pacific Islands Water Science Center, 1845 Wasp Boulevard, Bld 176</address>
          <city>Honolulu</city>
          <state>HI</state>
          <postal>96818</postal>
          <country>US</country>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>808-690-9583</cntvoice>
        <cntfax>808-690-9599</cntfax>
        <cntemail>ajohnson@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </ptcontac>
    <browse>
      <browsen>https://water.usgs.gov/GIS/browse/RN_recharge_graphic.png</browsen>
      <browsed>Image of the</browsed>
      <browset>png</browset>
    </browse>
    <native>Environment as of Metadata Creation: Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) 
Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.4.1 (Build 5686) Service Pack N/A (Build N/A)</native>
  </idinfo>
  <dataqual>
    <attracc>
      <attraccr>No formal attribute accuracy tests were conducted. Numerical values for the water-budget components 
were computed using the water-budget model described in U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5168.</attraccr>
    </attracc>
    <logic>No spatial overlaps were found in the shapefile associated with this metadata file. 
Numerical values are within expected ranges.</logic>
    <complete>Data set is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. 
Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details.</complete>
    <posacc>
      <horizpa>
        <horizpar>A formal accuracy assessment of the horizontal positional information in the data set has not been conducted. 
The horizontal accuracy of the polygons of this data set is a function of the horizontal accuracies of all other 
data sets used to create this data set. The horizontal accuracy of each of the other data sets, however, typically
 was not quantified. Therefore, the horizontal accuracy of this dataset cannot be quantified.</horizpar>
      </horizpa>
      <vertacc>
        <vertaccr>A formal accuracy assessment of the vertical positional information in the data set is not applicable.</vertaccr>
      </vertacc>
    </posacc>
    <lineage>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Liu, Z. and Fischer, L.</origin>
            <pubdate>20100101</pubdate>
            <title>The Republic of the Marshall Islands, vegetation mapping using very high spatial resolution imagery</title>
            <geoform>Vector Digital Data Set</geoform>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>McClellan, California, U.S.</pubplace>
              <publish>U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, State and Private Forestry, Remote Sensing Laboratory</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>https://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/r5/forest-grasslandhealth/?cid=fsbdev3_046690&amp;width=full</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy Resources</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <rngdates>
              <begdate>20080101</begdate>
              <enddate>20100101</enddate>
            </rngdates>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Land cover</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Source information used in support of the development of the data set.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>U.S. Geological Survey</origin>
            <pubdate>20100101</pubdate>
            <title>LANDFIRE.IS_120CC (LANDFIRE Forest Canopy Cover)</title>
            <geoform>Vector Digital Data Set</geoform>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>Sioux Falls, SD</pubplace>
              <publish>Wildland Fire Science, Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer/</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy Resources</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <rngdates>
              <begdate>20080101</begdate>
              <enddate>20081231</enddate>
            </rngdates>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Forest-canopy cover</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Source information used in support of the development of the data set.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, Dirk, and Smith, Martin</origin>
            <pubdate>19980101</pubdate>
            <title>Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56</title>
            <geoform>Other</geoform>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>Rome</pubplace>
              <publish>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/X0490E00.htm</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy Resources</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>19980101</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Evapotranspiration</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Source information used in support of estimating evapotranspiration</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Johnson, A.G., Engott, J.A., and Bassiouni, Maoya</origin>
            <pubdate>20141126</pubdate>
            <title>Spatially distributed groundwater recharge estimated using a water-budget model for the Island of Maui, Hawai‘i, 1978–2007</title>
            <serinfo>
              <sername>Scientific Investigations Report (SIR)</sername>
              <issue>2014–5168</issue>
            </serinfo>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>Reston, Virginia</pubplace>
              <publish>U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5168</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>http://doi.org/10.3133/sir20145168</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy Resources</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <rngdates>
              <begdate>19780101</begdate>
              <enddate>20071231</enddate>
            </rngdates>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Water-budget model</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Source information contained equations for the water-budget model calculations.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service</origin>
            <pubdate>20140101</pubdate>
            <title>Gridded soil survey geographic (gSSURGO) database, Marshall Islands</title>
            <geoform>Vector Digital Data Set</geoform>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>Fort Worth, Texas</pubplace>
              <publish>U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/GDGOrder.aspx?order=QuickState.</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy Resources</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>20140101</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Soils</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Source information used in support of estimating soil properties.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Wolff, D. B., Marks, D. A., Amitai, E., Silberstein, D. S., Fisher, B. L., Tokay, A., Wang, J., and Pippitt, J. L.</origin>
            <pubdate>20050401</pubdate>
            <title>Ground validation for the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)</title>
            <geoform>Publication (Journal Article)</geoform>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>American Meteorological Society</pubplace>
              <publish>Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>http://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1700.1</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy Resources</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <rngdates>
              <begdate>20000101</begdate>
              <enddate>20121231</enddate>
            </rngdates>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Rainfall</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Source information provided daily rainfall values used in water-budget model.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service</origin>
            <pubdate>20070817</pubdate>
            <title>Natural Color Orthophoto Mosaic of Kwajalein, Marshall Islands (MH) Part Two</title>
            <geoform>Raster Digital Data (Aerial Imagery)</geoform>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>Forth Worth, Texas</pubplace>
              <publish>U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <onlink>https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/GDGOrder.aspx</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy Resources</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <rngdates>
              <begdate>20040125</begdate>
              <enddate>20060528</enddate>
            </rngdates>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Land cover</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Source information used in support to delineate impervious areas.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <procstep>
        <procdesc>The spatial extents of the subareas in this shapefile were created in ArcMap by intersecting spatial datasets 
of land cover, forest-canopy cover, and impervious areas. Refer to the definition of "Subarea_ID" attribute in this 
metadata file for further information.</procdesc>
        <procdate>20141230</procdate>
      </procstep>
    </lineage>
  </dataqual>
  <spdoinfo>
    <direct>Vector</direct>
    <ptvctinf>
      <sdtsterm>
        <sdtstype>G-polygon</sdtstype>
        <ptvctcnt>68</ptvctcnt>
      </sdtsterm>
    </ptvctinf>
  </spdoinfo>
  <spref>
    <horizsys>
      <planar>
        <gridsys>
          <gridsysn>Universal Transverse Mercator</gridsysn>
          <utm>
            <utmzone>58</utmzone>
            <transmer>
              <sfctrmer>0.9996</sfctrmer>
              <longcm>165.0</longcm>
              <latprjo>0.0</latprjo>
              <feast>500000.0</feast>
              <fnorth>0.0</fnorth>
            </transmer>
          </utm>
        </gridsys>
        <planci>
          <plance>coordinate pair</plance>
          <coordrep>
            <absres>0.6096</absres>
            <ordres>0.6096</ordres>
          </coordrep>
          <plandu>Meter</plandu>
        </planci>
      </planar>
      <geodetic>
        <horizdn>D_WGS_1984</horizdn>
        <ellips>WGS_1984</ellips>
        <semiaxis>6378137.0</semiaxis>
        <denflat>298.257223563</denflat>
      </geodetic>
    </horizsys>
  </spref>
  <eainfo>
    <detailed>
      <enttyp>
        <enttypl>Monthly_WB_components_inches_Roi_Namur_2000_01 thru 2012_12</enttypl>
        <enttypd>Table containing attribute information associated with the data set.</enttypd>
        <enttypds>Producer defined</enttypds>
      </enttyp>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Subarea_ID</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Identification number of the model subarea. 
The model domain was subdivided into 68 polygons, termed subareas, mainly using spatial variations in 
land cover and forest-canopy cover. The spatial extents of the subareas were considered temporally 
constant during the historical simulation period from 2000 to 2012. Land cover was classified as either 
barren, forest, or urban using the land-cover map of Liu and Fischer (2010). Areas classified as water 
by Liu and Fischer (2010) were excluded from the water-budget model domain. All parts of the island 
with barren land cover were grouped into one subarea and assigned a Subarea_ID value of 1. Parts of 
the island with forest land cover were subdivided into nine subareas (Subarea_ID values: 57, 58, 59, 60, 
61, 62, 63, 64, and 65) on the basis of nine canopy-cover values (15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and 95 
percent, respectively) defined in a map of forest-canopy cover (U.S. Geological Survey, 2010). The 
remaining parts of the island were subdivided into 58 subareas with urban land cover. Rain water 
catchment basins and the part of the airport runway from which rain water was captured and retained, 
hereinafter referred to as “catchment water”, was assigned a Subarea_ID value of 2 (see description for 
R_Capture attribute).  An oval-shaped area assumed to have artificial recharge from surplus catchment 
water discharged to the ground was considered one subarea (Subarea_ID 68) in the model; this subarea 
represents a swale above a horizontal skimming well near the airport runway. The spatial extent 
Subarea_ID 68 was defined in a manner that would allow us to approximate the spatial dispersion of 
artificial recharge from surplus catchment water from the base of the root zone to the groundwater 
table. The part of the island consisting of impervious surfaces and pervious land within 20 feet of the 
impervious surfaces was subdivided into 55 subareas. We defined subareas in this manner for the 
model to account for “excess water”, the portion of rainfall that fell onto impervious surfaces and 
ultimately flowed onto adjacent pervious surfaces. Specifically, the spatial extents of these 55 
subareas were delineated using the ArcGIS Buffer tool, and with the following Buffer-tool options: 
(1) “Input Features” were shapefiles of impervious surfaces only, (2) “Linear unit” was 20 feet, (3) 
“Side Type” was FULL, (4) “End Type” was ROUND, (5) “Method” was PLANAR, and (6) “Dissolve 
Type” was ALL. The output of the ArcGIS buffer tool process was a shapefile consisting of one 
multipart polygon, whose spatial extent consisted of impervious surfaces and pervious surfaces 
within 20 feet of impervious surfaces. Next, the multipart polygon was separated into 55 polygons 
(subareas for the model) in ArcMap using manual edits and the “Explode Multipart Feature” tool 
in the Advanced Editing options of ArcMap. Impervious surfaces, mainly consisting of buildings 
and pavement, were identified in orthoimagery (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources 
Conservation Service, 2007) or were delineated on the basis of visits to the island by one of the 
authors in 2014. All remaining parts of the island had urban land cover and were grouped into one 
subarea and assigned a Subarea_ID value of 56.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>1</rdommin>
            <rdommax>68</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Area_sq_m</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Area of subarea, in square meters</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>359.064</rdommin>
            <rdommax>733783.791</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Land_Cover</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Land-cover name.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Liu and Fischer (2010)</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>Barren</edomv>
            <edomvd>Land cover is barren.</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>Forest</edomv>
            <edomvd>Land cover is forest.</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>Urban</edomv>
            <edomvd>Land cover is urban.</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>ImpervFrac</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The fraction of the subarea estimated to be covered by impervious surfaces, such as paved roads and buildings. 
The impervious fraction of each subarea was estimated using the extents of impervious surfaces that were 
(1) identified in orthoimagery (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2007) or 
(2) mapped during field work in 2014 and later delineated in a GIS. In the model calculations, the impervious 
fraction was used to separate, from the total rain that fell on a subarea, a depth of water that was treated 
computationally as though it fell on an impervious surface. The attribute definition for R_Capture includes 
a description of how ImpervFrac is used to compute the amount of rain water that flows to pervious surface 
or is captured by the rainfall-catchment system.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>0.99</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Fraction of 1</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Year</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Year</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>2000</rdommin>
            <rdommax>2012</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Month</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Month</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>1</rdommin>
            <rdommax>12</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Rain</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly rainfall, in inches. 
Monthly rainfall was summed from daily rainfall. Daily rainfall measurements from 17 rain gages that had available 
data were used to reconstruct the record of observed daily rainfall on Roi-Namur during 2000–12 for the water-budget 
model. The rainfall record for one of the rain gages was provided by Stan Jazwinski (Chugach Management Services, 
Inc., written communication, 2014). Rainfall records for the remaining rain gages, which were used to validate 
satellite-based rainfall estimates of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (Wolff and others, 2005), were obtained 
from http://trmm-fc.gsfc.nasa.gov/trmm_gv/gauge/index.html. Sixteen of the 17 rain gages were located on Roi-Namur. 
One rain gage, located on Gagan island about eight miles south-southeast of Roi-Namur, was used only to estimate 
daily rainfall in the model during January 1–April 19, 2000 when rainfall data were not available for any rain gages on 
Roi-Namur. The median of daily rainfall measurements for the rain gages on Roi-Namur was rounded to the nearest 
0.01 inches and then was used in the model for days when more than one rain gage had rainfall data. Although none 
of the 17 rain gages had complete records for 2000–12, existing records combined provided rainfall data for 99.8 
percent of the days during 2000-12, with data available from at least one rain gage on each of those days. Daily 
rainfall was assumed to be negligible on 10 (or 0.2 percent) of the days during 2000–12 when daily rainfall 
measurements were unavailable. December 2002 had six days with no rainfall measurements; January 2000 and 
2002 each had two days with no rainfall measurements.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0.24</rdommin>
            <rdommax>20.36</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Cnpy_Evap</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly forest-canopy evaporation, in inches. Monthly forest-canopy evaporation was summed from daily 
forest-canopy evaporation estimates. Subareas with barren and urban land cover were assigned Cnpy_Evap 
values of zero because the water-budget model computed canopy evaporation only for subareas with forest 
land cover. For subareas with forest land cover, daily forest-canopy evaporation was computed in the model 
on the basis of the following six parameters: daily rainfall, canopy cover, canopy capacity, stemflow (as a 
percentage of rainfall), trunk-storage capacity, and the ratio of mean evaporation rate to rainfall rate during 
saturated conditions (hereinafter “V”). All of these parameters except daily rainfall were assumed to be 
temporally constant. All of these parameters except canopy cover were assumed to be spatially uniform. 
A map of forest-canopy cover (U.S. Geological Survey, 2010) was used to estimate canopy-cover values of 
subareas with forest land cover. Canopy-cover values varied spatially between 0.15 and 0.95, which imply 
between 15 and 95 percent forest-canopy cover among forested subareas of Roi-Namur. Values assigned 
to canopy capacity (0.05 inch), stemflow (4 percent of rainfall), and trunk-storage capacity (0.01 inch) 
were the same as those used to estimate canopy evaporation in the water-budget model for Maui, Hawaii, 
as described in USGS SIR 2014-5168. The parameter V was estimated using hourly rainfall data and hourly 
reference grass evapotranspiration (ET) estimates for Kwajalein Island because such data and estimates 
were not available for Roi-Namur. Hourly rainfall data were obtained from 
http://trmm-fc.gsfc.nasa.gov/trmm_gv/gauge/index.html for two rain gages (named KWA0221 and KWA2201 
in the source dataset) on Kwajalein Island.
				An estimated value of V was developed for use in our water-budget model for Roi-Namur. First, 
we computed daily reference grass ET (hereinafter reference ET) using the method outlined in Allen and 
others (1998) and available meteorological data. Weather-station data and downwelling total solar-irradiance 
measurements (herein solar radiation) were obtained from www.ncdc.nooa.gov and 
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/data/index.php?site=kwj, respectively. Next, we estimated hourly reference 
ET by assuming it varied diurnally in proportion to solar radiation. Hourly reference ET was computed as the 
product of daily reference ET and an hourly solar factor where each hourly solar factor was equal to the ratio 
of hourly-to-daily solar radiation. Next, we computed values of V as the quotient of hourly reference ET and 
hourly rainfall for each hour when rainfall exceeded the canopy capacity (0.05 inches). Finally, we used the 
average (0.03) of all 5,421 computed hourly V values for 2000–12 in our water-budget calculations for 
Roi-Namur.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>1.995</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>R_Capture</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly rain water, in inches, that was captured from part of the runway for storage. This “rain-capture” component 
represents model estimates of rain water that fell on impervious surfaces on part of the airport runway and adjacent
 catchment basins and then was subsequently captured and stored. In the water-budget model, this component was 
limited to one subarea (Subarea_ID 2) that represents the part of the runway and catchment basins from which rain 
water was assumed to be captured. In the water-budget model, the rainfall retention-capacity of all impervious 
surfaces in the model area was assumed to be 0.25 inches, meaning that up to 0.25 inches of rain could be 
stored on an impervious surface, where it could evaporate or be stored until the following day. The remaining 
rain water, that in excess of 0.25 inches, was considered “excess water.” For one subarea (Subarea_ID 2), 
the excess water was assumed to be captured by a rainfall-catchment system. Daily amounts of excess 
water captured from this particular subarea were summed into monthly amounts that were reported in each 
shapefile as R_Capture. For each of the remaining subareas with an impervious-fraction value greater than 0, 
the model added excess water from the impervious surface to the plant-root zone of the pervious “buffer” area 
adjacent to and within 20 ft of the impervious surface.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>15.683</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>SC_water</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly surplus catchment water discharged to the ground, in inches. Beginning in 2009, 
personnel on Roi-Namur began to periodically discharge surplus catchment water to the ground as a means to 
recharge the island’s freshwater lens. On Roi-Namur, surplus catchment water was discharged to the ground 
from equipment at a few vertical wells distributed in an oval-shaped swale, represented by the subarea with 
Subarea_ID 68, above a horizontal skimming well adjacent to the airport runway. The surplus catchment 
water was a portion of the rain that fell on and was captured from part the airport runway and catchment 
basins adjacent to the runway (see description for R_Capture). A record of the volumes of catchment water 
that were discharged to the ground each day between 2009 and 2012 was provided by Stan Jazwinski, 
(Chugach Management Services, Inc., written communication, 2014). Daily volumes of surplus-catchment 
water were summed into monthly volumes, which were reported in this file as a uniform depth of water for 
the total area of one subarea (Subarea_ID 68). Refer to descriptions of the Actual_ET and Artfl_Rech 
attributes in this metadata file for explanations of the methods used to estimate evapotranspiration and 
artificial recharge from surplus catchment water discharged to the ground.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>34.794</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>P_ET</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly potential evapotranspiration, in inches. 
The rate of potential evapotranspiration (potential ET), which represents the maximum ET rate from the plant-root zone, 
is needed to compute the actual ET rate in the water-budget model. Potential ET for each subarea was estimated as the 
product of a crop coefficient and reference ET. 
Crop coefficients were assigned to each subarea according to land cover and were assumed to be temporally constant. 
The crop coefficient assigned to barren land cover, 1.18, was the average of the range of values suggested by Allen and
 others (1998) for bare soil. The crop coefficient assigned to urban land cover, 1.18, was the same as that used for 
developed land covers in a water-budget model for the island of Maui, Hawaii (see USGS SIR 2014-5168). The crop 
coefficient assigned to forest land cover, 0.69, also was used to compute actual ET for scrub forest and limestone 
forest land covers in a water-budget model for Guam [see Johnson (2012), a USGS SIR (2012-5028)]. The crop 
coefficients assigned to the barren and urban land-cover classes integrated the effects of transpiration and ground 
evaporation. The crop coefficients assigned to the forest land-cover class integrated the effects of transpiration and 
ground evaporation only, because canopy evaporation was accounted for separately (see fig.5 in USGS SIR 2014-5168). 
Reference ET, as defined for our analysis, is the ET rate of a hypothetical grass surface completely shading the ground, 
of uniform height, and optimum soil-water conditions for given climatic conditions. For input to the water-budget model, 
we created a record of monthly reference-ET values for 2000–12, and we assumed that reference ET was spatially 
uniform across Roi-Namur. Because climate data needed to compute reference ET for Roi-Namur during 2000–12 
were not available, we developed a linear regression using rainfall and other climate data from Kwajalein Island only. 
We developed the linear regression for the purpose of estimating monthly reference ET for Roi-Namur on the basis of 
daily rainfall records, the only multi-year ground-based climate dataset that was available for Roi-Namur (see definition 
for “Rain” attribute). To develop the linear regression, we first computed daily reference ET for Kwajalein Island according 
to the method described in Allen and others (1998) and by using values of (1) solar radiation obtained from NOAA Earth 
System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/data/index.php?site=kwj), and 
(2) average daily dew-point temperature, wind speed, and minimum and maximum daily air temperature obtained from 
National Climatic Data Center’s (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/) “global surface summary of the day” dataset for station 
number 913660. Next, we summed the daily reference-ET estimates for Kwajalein Island into monthly values. Next, 
we used the monthly reference-ET values and daily rainfall values (also obtained from http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/) for 
Kwajalein Island  during 1992–2009 to develop the following linear regression, hereinafter equation 1: RefET = 0.215 – 0.139 * RD, 
where RefET is monthly reference ET, expressed as a percentage difference from mean monthly reference ET during 1992–2009, 
and RD is the number of rain days per month, expressed as a percentage difference from mean monthly number of rainy days 
per month during 1992–2009. For example, according to equation 1, if the number of rain days for a given month was 20 
percent less than the mean number of rain days for that month (RD = -20), then monthly RefET would be 3 percent greater 
than mean monthly reference ET for the month. The period 1992–2009 was selected on the basis of data availability. For 
our analysis, only days with rainfall amounts of at least 0.01 inches were considered rain days, and all remaining days 
were considered dry days. The regression’s coefficient of determination, 0.187, was low, but its slope was significant 
(p-value was less than 0.0001). The intercept of equation 1 was not significant (p-value was 0.583). Given the dearth of 
available climate data for Roi-Namur, however, equation 1 was considered adequate for our analysis and was used to 
estimate monthly reference-ET values for Roi-Namur during 2000–12 as follows. First, an RD value was computed, for 
each month during 2000–12, as 100 percent times the quotient of (1) the number of rain days on Roi-Namur for the 
month minus the mean number of rain days on Kwajalein Island for the corresponding month during 1992–2009, and 
(2) the mean number of rain days on Kwajalein Island for the corresponding month during 1992–2009. Next, the RD 
values were applied in equation 1 to compute RefET values for each month during 2000–12. Last, each monthly 
reference ET value for Roi-Namur during 2000–12 was computed as the sum of (1) mean monthly reference ET 
for Kwajalein Island during 1992–2009 and (2) RefET divided by 100 percent times mean monthly reference ET 
for Kwajalein during 1992–2009. The resulting estimates of monthly reference ET for Roi-Namur during 2000–12, 
ranged from 0.17 to 0.25 inches per day and were used in the water-budget calculations. The monthly reference 
ET values we estimated for Roi-Namur using equation 1 were within 8 percent of the values that we estimated for 
Kwajalein Island using climate data. In the water-budget model for Roi-Namur, rates of daily reference ET were 
assumed to be uniform over each day in a given month, such that the rates for each day of a given month added 
up to the monthly rate.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>3.642</rdommin>
            <rdommax>8.956</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Actual_ET</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly actual evapotranspiration, in inches. Monthly actual evapotranspiration (ET) was summed from daily 
actual ET values. For subareas with barren and urban land covers, actual ET computed by the water-budget 
model implicitly represents the sum of transpiration and ground evaporation. For subareas with forest land 
cover, actual ET computed by the water-budget model implicitly represents the sum of transpiration and 
ground evaporation only because canopy evaporation was computed separately (refer to USGS 2014-5168 
for further explanation). Actual ET for each subarea was computed using equations 10 through 14 in USGS 
SIR 2014-5168. Collectively, these equations require potential ET, which is computed by the water-budget 
model (see P_ET), and three model-input parameters for the plant-root zone: depletion fraction, root depth, 
and available water capacity. Potential ET, depletion fraction, and root depth varied spatially according to 
land cover, whereas depletion fraction was assumed to be spatially uniform. Potential ET varied temporally, 
whereas depletion fraction, root depth, and available water capacity were assumed to be temporally constant. 
Subareas with barren and urban land covers were assigned a depletion fraction of 0.5, the same as that used 
in USGS SIR 2014-5168. Subareas with forest land cover were assigned a depletion fraction of 1.0 because 
tree roots were assumed to extend into saturated groundwater. Subareas with forest land cover were assigned 
a root depth of 60 inches. The root depths assigned to subareas with urban land cover, 12 inches, and with 
barren land cover, 5 inches, were the same as those used in water-budget models for Guam (see USGS SIR 
2012-5028) and Maui (see USGS SIR 2014-5168). Estimates of available water capacity of soils for Kwajalein 
Island and for islands of nearby atolls were used in the water budget because such estimates for soils on 
Roi-Namur were not found. An available water capacity value of 5 percent, or 0.05 inches of plant-available 
water per inch of soil depth, was considered by Hunt and Peterson (1980) to be representative of soils on 
Kwajalein Island. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (2014) soil database did not include the islands 
of Kwajalein Atoll, but did include the islands of nearby atolls (Maloelap, Aur, Majuro, Arno, and Mili). Based 
on this soil database, the available water capacity of soils on the islands of these nearby atolls averaged 6 
percent for depths of 0–20 inches, 5 percent for depths of 20–60 inches, and 0 percent below 60 inches. The 
soil database also indicated that no root-restricting zones were identified in the top 60 inches of the soil units 
for these five atolls. Accordingly, for our water-budget model for Roi-Namur, available water capacity of the soil 
was set to 5 percent for the top 60 inches of soil for all subareas of the Roi-Namur water-budget model. Actual 
ET for one subarea (Subarea_ID 68) includes evapotranspiration of surplus catchment water that was discharged 
to the ground during 2009–2012 (see description for SC_Water). On Roi-Namur, surplus catchment water was 
discharged to the ground from equipment at a few vertical wells distributed in an oval-shaped swale, represented 
by the subarea with Subarea_ID 68, above a horizontal skimming well. For our estimates of evapotranspiration of 
surplus catchment water, we assumed that surplus catchment water was discharged uniformly onto the ground 
within five circles, each with a 50-ft radius, centered at points assumed to represent five vertical wells distributed 
in the swale above the horizontal skimming well. Actual ET estimated in this manner was 5 percent of the total 
catchment water discharged onto the ground during 2009–12.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0.129</rdommin>
            <rdommax>7.105</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Total_ET</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly total evapotranspiration, in inches. Monthly total evapotranspiration (ET) was 
summed from daily total ET values. Daily total ET equaled the sum of canopy evaporation and actual ET.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0.24</rdommin>
            <rdommax>7.096</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Ntrl_Rech</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly natural recharge, in inches, from rainfall. Excludes recharge from surplus catchment water (SC_Water) that 
was discharged to the ground. Monthly natural recharge was summed from daily natural recharge. Daily natural 
recharge for all subareas was computed using equations 1–15 in USGS SIR 2014-5168 and using input data 
described in this metadata file.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>15.263</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Artfl_Rech</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly artificial recharge, in inches, from surplus catchment water discharged to the ground (SC_Water). Excludes 
natural recharge from rainfall, and considered for one subarea (Subarea_ID 68) only. Artificial recharge from surplus 
catchment water was assumed to equal the difference between the amount of surplus catchment water discharged 
to the ground (SC_water) and the amount of actual ET of SC_water (see description for Actual_ET).</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>34.258</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Total_Rech</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Monthly total recharge, in inches. Equals the sum of natural recharge (Ntrl_Rech) from rainfall and artificial recharge 
(Artfl_Rech) from surplus catchment water discharged to the ground (see descriptions of Ntrl_Rech and Artfl_Rech). 
Only one subarea (Subarea_ID 68) has artificial recharge values that are greater than 0. The remaining subareas 
have natural recharge only.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>40.840</rdommax>
            <attrunit>Inches</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
    </detailed>
    <overview>
      <eaover>The entity and attribute information provided here describes the tabular data associated with the data set. 
Please review the detailed descriptions that are provided (the individual attribute descriptions) for information 
on the values that appear as fields/table entries of the data set. The minimum and maximum values reported here 
indicate the range of values for all 156 shapefiles in the zipped folder "Monthly_water_budget_Roi-Namur_2000-12.zip".</eaover>
      <eadetcit>The entity and attribute information was generated by the individual and/or agency identified as the originator of 
the data set. Please review the rest of the metadata record for additional details and information.</eadetcit>
    </overview>
  </eainfo>
  <distinfo>
    <distrib>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntorgp>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey</cntorg>
          <cntper>Michael Ierardi</cntper>
        </cntorgp>
        <cntpos>IT Specialist</cntpos>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing</addrtype>
          <address>445 National Center</address>
          <city>Reston</city>
          <state>VA</state>
          <postal>20192</postal>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS)</cntvoice>
        <cntemail>mierardi@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </distrib>
    <distliab>Although this data set has been used by the U.S. Geological
Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, no warranty expressed or
implied is made by the U.S. Geological Survey as to the accuracy
of the data and related materials. The act of distribution shall not 
constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by 
the U.S. Geological Survey in the use of this data, software, or 
related materials.
		
Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive
purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
Government.</distliab>
    <stdorder>
      <digform>
        <digtinfo>
          <formname>Shape</formname>
          <formcont>Online accessible data</formcont>
          <filedec>WinZip compressed file</filedec>
          <transize>0.11</transize>
        </digtinfo>
        <digtopt>
          <onlinopt>
            <computer>
              <networka>
                <networkr>https://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/Monthly_water_budget_Roi-Namur_2000-12.zip</networkr>
              </networka>
            </computer>
          </onlinopt>
        </digtopt>
      </digform>
      <fees>None. This dataset is provided by USGS as a public service.</fees>
    </stdorder>
  </distinfo>
  <metainfo>
    <metd>20201117</metd>
    <metc>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntorgp>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey</cntorg>
        </cntorgp>
        <cntpos>Ask USGS -- Water Webserver Team</cntpos>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing</addrtype>
          <address>445 National Center</address>
          <city>Reston</city>
          <state>VA</state>
          <postal>20192</postal>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS)</cntvoice>
        <cntemail>mierardi@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </metc>
    <metstdn>FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata</metstdn>
    <metstdv>FGDC-STD-001-1998</metstdv>
  </metainfo>
</metadata>
