Jason Bellino John Mecikalski 20250922 Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) ScienceBase U.S. Geological Survey, Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center Bellino, Jason C. and Mecikalski, J.R., 2025, Daily reference and potential evapotranspiration, supporting meteorological data from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, solar insolation data from the GOES satellite, and blue-sky albedo data from the MODIS satellite, Southeastern United States, 2024: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P1TYRTH3. https://doi.org/10.5066/P1TYRTH3 Jason Bellino John Mecikalski W. Barclay Shoemaker 2024 ScienceBase U.S. Geological Survey https://doi.org/10.5066/P9SF5Z7L Potential evapotranspiration (PET) and reference evapotranspiration (ETo) are estimated at an approximately 1-kilometer spatial grid and daily time-step from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 for Florida, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and parts of Mississippi, North Carolina, and Tennessee. PET and ETo were computed from solar radiation, meteorological data (min/max temperature, min/max relative humidity, and mean wind speed at 2-meter height), and shortwave blue-sky albedo data. Solar radiation was computed from Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) sensor data, blue-sky albedo was computed from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) MCD43A1 BRDF/Albedo data product, and meteorological data were simulated using a high-resolution Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Open-source tools for managing the NetCDF files in this data release can be found at https://code.usgs.gov/cfwsc/goes-et. In Florida, potential and reference evapotranspiration are required for many community planning activities such as water-use permitting and regulation, estimating agricultural-irrigation demands, scientific evaluations of ecosystem resiliency, and modeling surface water and groundwater systems to evaluate the sustainability of water supplies. A supplementary zipfile, "validation.zip", is included in this data release which contains data files related to validation of the WRF output and the ETo and PET calculated therefrom. The zipfile is organized into subdirectories corresponding to parameters used to calculate evapotranspiration: actual vapor pressure ("ea"), saturation vapor pressure ("es"), potential evapotranspiration ("pet"), reference evapotranspiration ("ret"), daily maximum temperature ("tmax"), daily minimum temperature ("tmin"), and daily mean windspeed at 2-meters ("ws2m"). Although they were not used in calculations of ETo and PET, subdirectories corresponding to daily maximum relative humidity ("hmax") and daily minimum relative humidity ("hmin") were also included since these parameters are available as direct measurements at weather stations across the southeastern United States. Within the subdirectory for each of the parameters are (1) ascii files—one for each weather station—containing values measured at weather stations across the southeastern United States and the corresponding modelled values from the WRF model at the weather station location ("measured" values of ETo and PET are computed from measured parameter values at a given weather station) and (2) a portable document file (PDF) containing plots of the validation data. Also included is an ascii file, "validation_stations.csv", that lists weather stations used to validate WRF-based meteorological parameters as well as whether a given station was used to compute bias-corrections for ETo and PET. Atmospheric water vapor content in the WRF model is tracked by a state variable that represents the water vapor mixing ratio which is converted to actual vapor pressure (Ea) and saturation vapor pressure (Es) for use in computing ETo and PET. In order to validate the water vapor content of the model, Ea and Es were calculated from available measurements of relative humidity and temperature at weather stations using equations 11 and 17 of Allen (1998). The simulated water vapor mixing ratio was also converted to relative humidity as an additional check on modelled water vapor content to observed ground conditions. The file "validation_statistics.csv" contains statistics from the comparison between measured and modelled values at weather station locations. 20240101 20241231 ground condition In Work Annually -89.803856 -78.05828 36.79065 24.280754 USGS Thesaurus evaporation transpiration water cycle water budget atmospheric and climatic processes none regional climate model weather research and forecast model high resolution climate simulation hydroclimate hydrology USGS Metadata Identifier USGS:68a5c983d4be027b0a1923e7 Common geographic areas Georgia Alabama Florida Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee South Atlantic-Gulf Lower Mississippi none South Florida Water Management District Southwest Florida Water Management District St. Johns River Water Management District North Florida Water Management District Suwannee River Water Management District No access constraints. Please see 'Distribution Info' for details. These data are marked with a Creative Common CC0 1.0 Universal License. These data are in the public domain and do not have any use constraints. Users are advised to read the dataset's metadata thoroughly to understand appropriate use and data limitations. Aside from reference and potential evapotranspiration, other variables were not bias-corrected and are no longer internally consistent with computed evapotranspiration. Solar insolation data come from the GOES satellite and represent the best-available, spatially-continuous dataset; however, meteorological data are from a numerical simulation and are not internally consistent with solar insolation. Jason Bellino U.S. Geological Survey, Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center Hydrologist mailing and physical

10770 N 46th St, Suite E700

Tampa FL 33617 USA 813-224-5078 jbellino@usgs.gov browse_wrf.png Mean 2024 PET and ETo png South Florida Water Management District, Southwest Florida Water Management District, St. Johns River Water Management District, North Florida Water Management District, Suwannee River Water Management District, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Geological Survey, University of Georgia Weather Network (weather.uga.edu) Allen, R.G. Pereira, L.S. Raes, D. Smith, M. 1998 Irrigation and Drainage no. 56 Rome, Italy Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/X0490E00.htm John Mecikalski W. Barclay Shoemaker Qinglong Wu Michael A. Holmes Simon J. Paech David M. Sumner 2018 Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering v. 144, no. 9, pp. 17 Reston, Va. American Society of Civil Engineers https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001312 Schaaf, Crystal B. Wang, Zhuosen 2021 NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC NASA https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD43A1.061 University of Georgia 2025 Athens, Ga College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia http://weather.uga.edu/ University of Florida 2025 Gainesville, Fl Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida https://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/ South Florida Water Management District 2025 West Palm Beach, Fl South Florida Water Management District https://www.sfwmd.gov/science-data/dbhydro Accuracy for meteorological data from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model can be found in the accompanying text file named "validation_statistics.csv". Daily shortwave blue-sky albedos are from MODIS BRDF/Albedo/NBAR Product MCD43A1 for which details can be found at https://www.umb.edu/spectralmass/terra_aqua_modis/modis_brdf_albedo_product_mcd43. Details on the computation of shortwave blue-sky albedo from the raw MODIS BRDF product can be found at https://github.com/jjmcnelis/mcd43a1-albedo-python. Details for the accuracy and methodology for computation of solar insolation used can be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001312. No formal logical accuracy tests were conducted. Data set is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details, such as use of MODIS albedos, and radial basis interpolation. No formal positional accuracy tests were conducted. No formal positional accuracy tests were conducted. Python script was run to compute PET and ETo using the Priestley-Taylor equation and the FAO Penman-Monteith method, respectively (Mecikalski and others, 2018). 20250811 Bias corrections were computed for ETo using a linear regression equation (ETo_corrected = (ETo_uncorrected - intercept) * slope) for all points (slope = 1.02, intercept = -0.16) using ETo computed from ground-based station data. Bias correction regressions were calibrated using ETo computed from weather station data that had all meteorological variables available and with 97 percent complete record. Data included 37 stations from the Florida Automated Weather Network, 7 stations from the South Florida Water Management District DBHYDRO database , and 86 stations from the Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network. Bias corrections are considered provisional and subject to change. 20250811 Bias corrections were computed for PET using a linear regression equation (PET_corrected = (PET_uncorrected - intercept) * slope) for all points (slope = 1.00, intercept = 0.04) using PET computed from ground-based station data. Bias correction regressions were calibrated using PET computed from weather station data that had all meteorological variables available and with 97 percent complete record. Data included 37 stations from the Florida Automated Weather Network, 7 stations from the South Florida Water Management District DBHYDRO database, and 86 stations from the Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network. Bias corrections are considered provisional and subject to change. 20250811 Raster Albers Conformal Conic (USGS National Hydrogeologic Grid) 29.5 45.5 -96.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 coordinate pair 1000.00000 1000.00000 meters D_WGS_1984 WGS84 6378137.0 298.257223563 fl.et.wrf.2024.v.1.0.nc This NetCDF file contains daily reference and potential evapotranspiration, and supporting meteorological data from the WRF model, solar insolation data from the GOES satellite, and blue-sky albedo data from the MODIS satellite for the southeastern United States, 2024. Producer Defined lat Latitude Producer defined 24.2808 36.7906 degrees lon Longitude Producer defined -89.8039 -78.0583 degrees time Time, in days since 1985-1-1 00:00:00 Producer defined 14244 14609 days since 1985-1-1 00:00:00 date ASCII date string: 4-digit year, 2-digit month, 2-digit day (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None x Albers easting Producer defined 630455.0 1601455.0 meters y Albers northing Producer defined 270785.0 1550785.0 meters ETo Bias-corrected reference evapotranspiration Producer defined 0.00 9.41 millimeters per day PET Bias-corrected potential evapotranspiration Producer defined 0.00 10.16 millimeters per day Solar Incoming solar radiation Producer defined 0.31 32.40 megajoules per square meter per day Albedo Shortwave blue-sky albedo Producer defined 0.000 0.749 unitless Tmin Daily minimum air temperature Producer defined -27.43 31.47 degrees Celsius Tmax Daily maximum air temperature Producer defined -15.45 41.59 degrees Celsius Ea Daily mean actual vapor pressure Producer defined 0.05 3.92 kPa Es Daily mean saturation vapor pressure Producer defined 0.10 5.09 kPa RHmin Daily minimum relative humidity Producer defined 0.33 100.00 percent RHmax Daily maximum relative humidity Producer defined 18.74 100.00 percent ws2m Daily mean wind speed at 2m height Producer defined 0.17 23.88 meters per second SolarCode GOES solar data quality code Producer defined 1 Good quality Producer defined 2 Usable data Producer defined 3 Uncertain or unverifiable quality Producer defined 4 Unusable or missing Producer defined -9999 No data Producer defined validation_PET_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily mean potential evapotranspiration using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Computed daily mean potential evapotranspiration value using weather station data Producer defined 0.17 7.49 millimeters per day modelled Computed daily mean potential evapotranspiration value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined 0.16 7.95 millimeters per day validation_ETo_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily mean reference evapotranspiration using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Computed daily mean reference evapotranspiration value using weather station data Producer defined 0.28 6.40 millimeters per day modelled Computed daily mean reference evapotranspiration value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined -0.07 6.76 millimeters per day validation_RHmax_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily maximum relative humidity using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Observed daily maximum relative humidity value at weather station location Producer defined 60.35 98.70 percent modelled Modelled daily maximum relative humidity value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined 71.89 100.00 percent validation_RHmin_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily minimum relative humidity using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Observed daily minimum relative humidity value at weather station location Producer defined 19.28 94.20 percent modelled Modelled daily minimum relative humidity value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined 19.29 100.00 percent validation_Tmax_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily maximum temperature using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Observed daily maximum temperature value at weather station location Producer defined 5.36 35.98 degrees Celsius modelled Modelled daily maximum temperature value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined 4.80 37.39 degrees Celsius validation_Tmin_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily minimum temperature using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Observed daily minimum temperature value at weather station location Producer defined -7.62 25.52 degrees Celsius modelled Modelled daily minimum temperature value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined -6.47 24.95 degrees Celsius validation_Ea_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily mean actual vapor pressure using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Observed daily mean actual vapor pressure value at weather station location Producer defined 0.30 3.30 kilopascals modelled Modelled daily mean actual vapor pressure value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined 0.29 3.37 kilopascals validation_Es_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily mean saturation vapor pressure using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Observed daily mean saturation vapor pressure value at weather station location Producer defined 0.56 4.23 kilopascals modelled Modelled daily mean saturation vapor pressure value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined 0.54 4.27 kilopascals validation_ws2m_XXXX.csv Comma-delimited ascii text file containing data used to validate daily mean 2-meter wind speed using WRF-based meteorological parameters (modelled) versus observed values (measured) where XXXX denotes the station number associated with the data. Attribute definitions apply to validation files for all stations for this parameter. Producer defined Date Date (YYYY-MM-DD) Producer defined 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 None observed Observed daily mean 2-meter wind speed value at weather station location Producer defined 0.72 6.11 meters per second modelled Modelled daily mean 2-meter wind speed value using interpolated WRF output at weather station location Producer defined 0.79 3.47 meters per second validation_ETo.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily mean reference evapotranspiration showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily mean reference evapotranspiration along the x-axis and modelled daily mean reference evapotranspiration along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily mean reference evapotranspirationn on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily mean reference evapotranspiration calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in millimeters per day Producer defined Real values Measured daily mean reference evapotranspiration calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in millimeters per day Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily mean reference evapotranspiration, in millimeters per day Producer defined Real values validation_PET.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily mean potential evapotranspiration showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily mean potential evapotranspiration along the x-axis and modelled daily mean potential evapotranspiration along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily mean potential evapotranspirationn on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily mean potential evapotranspiration calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in millimeters per day Producer defined Real values Measured daily mean potential evapotranspiration calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in millimeters per day Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily mean potential evapotranspiration, in millimeters per day Producer defined Real values validation_RHmax.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily maximum relative humidity showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily maximum relative humidity along the x-axis and modelled daily maximum relative humidity along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily maximum relative humidityn on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily maximum relative humidity calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in percent Producer defined Real values Measured daily maximum relative humidity calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in percent Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily maximum relative humidity, in percent Producer defined Real values validation_RHmin.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily minimum relative humidity showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily minimum relative humidity along the x-axis and modelled daily minimum relative humidity along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily minimum relative humidityn on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily minimum relative humidity calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in percent Producer defined Real values Measured daily minimum relative humidity calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in percent Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily minimum relative humidity, in percent Producer defined Real values validation_Tmax.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily maximum temperature showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily maximum temperature along the x-axis and modelled daily maximum temperature along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily maximum temperaturen on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily maximum temperature calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in degrees Celsius Producer defined Real values Measured daily maximum temperature calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in degrees Celsius Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily maximum temperature, in degrees Celsius Producer defined Real values validation_Tmin.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily minimum temperature showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily minimum temperature along the x-axis and modelled daily minimum temperature along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily minimum temperaturen on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily minimum temperature calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in degrees Celsius Producer defined Real values Measured daily minimum temperature calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in degrees Celsius Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily minimum temperature, in degrees Celsius Producer defined Real values validation_ws2m.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily mean 2-meter wind speed showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily mean 2-meter wind speed along the x-axis and modelled daily mean 2-meter wind speed along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily mean 2-meter wind speedn on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily mean 2-meter wind speed calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in meters per second Producer defined Real values Measured daily mean 2-meter wind speed calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in meters per second Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily mean 2-meter wind speed, in meters per second Producer defined Real values validation_Ea.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily mean actual vapor pressure showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily mean actual vapor pressure along the x-axis and modelled daily mean actual vapor pressure along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily mean actual vapor pressuren on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily mean actual vapor pressure calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in kilopascals Producer defined Real values Measured daily mean actual vapor pressure calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in kilopascals Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily mean actual vapor pressure, in kilopascals Producer defined Real values validation_Es.pdf This portable document format file contains 1) a box-plot of daily mean saturation vapor pressure showing the median, Q1, Q3, and outliers greater than 1.5*IQR (IQR=Q3-Q1) for all stations; 2) scatter plots for each station showing measured (calculated) daily mean saturation vapor pressure along the x-axis and modelled daily mean saturation vapor pressure along the y-axis with regression line and regression variables; and 3) time-series plots for each station showing measured (calculated) and modelled daily mean saturation vapor pressuren on the same axis. Producer Defined Modelled daily mean saturation vapor pressure calculated using modelled (WRF) meteorological variables, in kilopascals Producer defined Real values Measured daily mean saturation vapor pressure calculated using measured (weather station) meteorological variables, in kilopascals Producer defined Real values Difference Difference between modelled and measured daily mean saturation vapor pressure, in kilopascals Producer defined Real values validation_stations.csv This comma-delimited ascii text file contains a list of weather stations used to validate WRF-based meteorological parameters. Producer defined NUM Station number Producer defined 110 1434 None NAME Station name Producer defined Name of weather station LAT Latitude Producer defined 25.5126 34.8851 decimal degrees LONG Longitude Producer defined -87.1402 -80.0870 decimal degrees AGENCY Name of source agency or entity. Producer defined FAWN Florida Automated Weather Network Producer defined SFWMD South Florida Water Management District Producer defined AEMN Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network Producer defined STATIONID Weather station identification number or name assigned by responsible agency Producer defined Identification number or name of weather station eto_bias_correction_station Denotes whether a station was used to compute bias corrections for reference evapotranspiration Producer defined NULL Station was not used to compute bias corrections Producer defined x Station was used to compute bias corrections Producer defined pet_bias_correction_station Denotes whether a station was used to compute bias corrections for potential evapotranspiration Producer defined NULL Station was not used to compute bias corrections Producer defined x Station was used to compute bias corrections Producer defined Jason Bellino U.S. Geological Survey, Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center Hydrologist mailing and physical

10770 N 46th St, Suite E700

Tampa FL 33617 USA 813-224-5078 jbellino@usgs.gov Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. netCDF 4 NetCDF file contains reference and potential evapotranspiration and meteorological data. 4109.37 https://prod-is-usgs-sb-prod-content.s3.amazonaws.com/68a5c983d4be027b0a1923e7/fl.et.wrf.2024.v.1.0.nc?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAI7K4IX6D4QLARINA&Expires=1758653195&Signature=gUgCBg1hKsexHoPFSeXArcEnne0%3D Digital download none 20250924 Jason Bellino U.S. Geological Survey, Caribbean-Florida Water Science Center Hydrologist mailing and physical

10770 N 46th St, Suite E700

Tampa FL 33617 USA 813-224-5078 jbellino@usgs.gov Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998