Andrew P. Teeple Shana L. Mashburn Evin J. Fetkovich Isaac A. Dale 20250626 tabular digital data Denver, Colorado U.S. Geological Survey This dataset is a subset of Teeple, A.P., Lucena, Z., Payne, J.D., Fetkovich, E.J., Mashburn, S.L., and Dale, I.A., 2025, Data used for the characterization of the hydrogeologic framework, groundwater-flow system, geochemistry, and aquifer hydraulic properties of the shallow groundwater system in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas of the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site near Bristow, Oklahoma, 2022: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9FR2ZF6. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9FR2ZF6 Andrew P. Teeple Zulimar Lucena Christopher L. Braun Evin J. Fetkovich Isaac A. Dale Shana L. Mashburn 2025 publication n/a US Geological Survey https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20255042 The Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site (hereinafter referred to as “the site”) was formerly an oil refinery in northeast of Bristow in Creek County, Oklahoma. Historical refinery operations contaminated the soil, surface water, streambed sediments, alluvium, and groundwater with refined and stored products at the site. The Wilcox and Lorraine process areas are where the highest concentrations of volatile organic compounds, semivolatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and trace elements (including metals) (collectively hereinafter referred to as “contaminants”) were measured in a local shallow perched groundwater system within the alluvium (hereinafter referred to as the “alluvial aquifer”) at the site during previous site assessments. In order to understand the potential migration of contaminants through the soil and groundwater in these areas, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, investigated aquifer characteristics of the alluvial aquifer in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas of the site to (1) document hydraulic conductivity and other aquifer characteristics of the alluvial aquifer that govern contaminant fate and transport, (2) describe the geospatial extent and concentration of the contaminants in the alluvial aquifer in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas, and (3) describe the geochemical controls pertaining to oxidation and reduction governing the fate and transport and the degradation potential of contaminants in the groundwater. This data release documents the data that were collected and briefly describes how they were used to characterize the hydrogeologic framework, groundwater-flow system, geochemistry, and aquifer hydraulic properties of the shallow groundwater system. Refer to the companion larger work citation (Teeple and others, 2025) for the complete description and data analyses. Twenty new groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site by the U.S. Geological Survey in October 2022, to collect groundwater-level altitude measurements and groundwater-quality samples within the alluvial aquifer, thus supplementing the existing data from older groundwater monitoring wells and piezometers at the site. An electrical conductivity log and a soil core were collected at each location where a groundwater monitoring well was installed to better understand and correlate observations in the subsurface and more accurately determine contamination zones. Electrical conductivity log and soil-core data were used to evaluate selected attributes of the hydrogeologic framework of the shallow groundwater system including the geospatial extents of hydrogeologic units, bed orientations, hydrogeologic unit thicknesses, and their outcrop and subcrop locations in the study area. 20221004 20221208 ground condition Complete None planned -96.387165 -96.381076 35.844497 35.839205 ISO 19115 Topic Category geoscientificInformation USGS Thesaurus electrical resistivity logging push coring GPS measurement scientific interpretation conceptual modeling geospatial datasets hydrogeology lithostratigraphy geophysics unconsolidated deposits petroleum geologic contacts stratigraphic thickness industrial pollution None Superfund Wilcox Oil Company benzene aquifer characterization well installation hydrogeologic framework USGS Metadata Identifier USGS:67522522d34e5c4500cf4797 Geographic Names Information System Bristow Oklahoma Creek County None. Please refer to the "Distribution Information" section for details. None. Users are advised to read the dataset's metadata thoroughly to understand appropriate use and data limitations. Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center Public Information Officer U.S. Geological Survey mailing and physical

1505 Ferguson Lane

Austin TX 78754 USA 512-927-3500 otpublicinfo@usgs.gov Comma Separated Values (.csv) files are provided. These text files can be opened by any text editor. The operating system and software used to open, view, and manipulate the files included in this data release are as follows: Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise (Version 22H2 Build 19045.3086 Experience Pack 1000.19041.1000.0) Microsoft Excel for Microsoft 365 MSO (Version 2208 Build 16.0.15601.20698) 32-bit ConvertToRinex (Version 3.1.4.0) All feature attribute values were peer reviewed. Refer to the "Methodology" and "Process Step" sections found within the "Lineage" part of the "Data Quality Information" section for a description of the quality-assurance and quality-control steps performed on the dataset. All data match the information provided by their associated metadata and reported values fall within the expected ranges. The dataset was assessed for the presence or absence of relevant data. The dataset is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details. No formal positional accuracy tests were conducted. Groundwater monitoring well locations were recorded from static real-time kinematic Global Positioning System occupations and processed by using rapid-static processing from the Online Positioning User Service (National Geodetic Survey, 2024) and Trimble's CenterPoint RTX post-processing (Trimble Inc., 2024) technology. The reported horizontal positional accuracies ranged between 0.02 to 0.73 feet. No formal positional accuracy tests were conducted. Groundwater monitoring well locations were recorded from static real-time kinematic Global Positioning System occupations and processed by using rapid-static processing from the Online Positioning User Service (National Geodetic Survey, 2024) and Trimble's CenterPoint RTX post-processing (Trimble Inc., 2024) technology. The reported vertical positional accuracies ranged between 0.1 to 1.1 feet. National Geodetic Survey 2024 website https://geodesy.noaa.gov/OPUS/ Digital and/or Hardcopy 20241121 date website was accessed National Geodetic Survey (2024) Online tool that was used to post-process the real-time kinematic Global Positioning System data. Trimble Inc. 2024 website https://trimblertx.com/UploadForm.aspx Digital and/or Hardcopy 20241121 date website was accessed Trimble Inc. (2024) Online tool that was used to post-process the real-time kinematic Global Positioning System data. Teeple, A.P. 2017 publication U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017-5028 Reston, Virginia U.S. Geological Survey 183 p., accessed May 25, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175028 Digital and/or Hardcopy 2017 publication date Teeple (2017) Provides definitions and basic information on electrical geophysical methods. Lucius, J.E. Langer, W.H. Ellefsen, K.J. 2007 publication Reston, Virginia U.S. Geological Survey 33 p., accessed August 22, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1310 Digital and/or Hardcopy 2007 publication date Lucius and others (2007) Provides definitions and basic information on geophysical methods and expected values. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2023 website accessed July 10, 2024 https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Understanding_and_interpreting_soils_and_soil_boring_reports_for_infiltration_BMPs Digital and/or Hardcopy 20240710 date website was accessed Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2023) Provides the definition for depth of refusal. Kejr, Inc. 2023 website https://geoprobe.com/tooling/direct-push-tooling Digital and/or Hardcopy 20230524 date website was accessed Kejr, Inc. (2023a) Provided information on the direct-push tooling method. Kejr, Inc. 2023 website https://geoprobe.com/direct-image/ec-electrical-conductivity Digital and/or Hardcopy 20230525 date website was accessed Kejr, Inc. (2023b) Provided information about the direct-push electrical conductivity tool. Stanley, T.M. 2017 publication n/a Oklahoma Geological Survey 1 sheet, scale 1:100,000, accessed March 9, 2022 https://ou.edu/content/dam/ogs/documents/ogqs/OGQ-94-color.pdf Digital and/or Hardcopy 2017 publication date Stanley (2017) Provides information on the geology in the study area. Wentworth, C.K. 1922 publication Journal of Geology v. 30, no. 5 p. 377–392.; accessed August 22, 2023 https://www.jstor.org/stable/30063207 Digital and/or Hardcopy 1922 publication date Wentworth (1922) Resource used for describing the lithology of the soil cores. Compton, R.R. 1962 publication New York Wiley 378 p. Digital and/or Hardcopy 1962 publication date Compton (1962) Resource used for describing the lithology of the soil cores. Shepard, F.P. 1954 publication Journal of Sedimentary Research v. 24 no. 3 pgs. 151-158, accessed October 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1306/D4269774-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D Digital and/or Hardcopy 1954 publication date Shepard (1954) Resource used for describing the lithology of the soil cores. Schlee, J.S. 1973 publication U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 529-L Washington, D.C. U.S. Geological Survey 64 p., 6 pls., accessed October 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3133/pp529L Digital and/or Hardcopy 1973 publication date Schlee (1973) Resource used for describing the lithology of the soil cores. Folk, R.L. 1980 publication Austin, Texas Hemphill Publishing Company 182 p. Digital and/or Hardcopy 1980 publication date Folk (1980) Resource used for describing the lithology of the soil cores. Poppe, L.J. McMullen, K.Y. Williams, S.J. Paskevich, V.F. 2005 publication U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1001 Reston, Virginia U.S. Geological Survey accessed October 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20051001 Digital and/or Hardcopy 2005 publication date Poppe and others (2005) Resource used for describing the lithology of the soil cores. Munsell Color Co., Inc. 1992 publication Grand Rapids, Michigan n/a https://munsell.com/color-products/color-communications-products/environmental-color-communication/munsell-soil-color-charts/ Digital and/or Hardcopy 1992 publication date Munsell Color Co., Inc. (1992) Resource used for describing the lithology of the soil cores. Kejr, Inc. 2023 website https://geoprobe.com/tooling/prepacked-screen-monitoring-wells Digital and/or Hardcopy 20230525 date website was accessed Kejr, Inc. (2023c) Provided information on the prepacked screens for the monitoring wells. Zheng, W. Tannant, D. 2016 publication Canadian Geotechnical Journal v. 53, no. 9 pgs. 1412-1423; accessed July 10, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0045 Digital and/or Hardcopy 2016 publication date Zheng and Tannant (2016) Provides the definition for the mesh sand used in well completion. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC 2020 publication Dallas, Texas U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC, Lewisville, Texas, under contract no. EP–W–06–004, EPA identification no. OK0001010917, 3,242 p., accessed May 31, 2022 https://semspub.epa.gov/work/06/90043353.pdf Digital and/or Hardcopy 2020 publication date EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC (2020) Provides information for soil cores collected at the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site as well as information on the historical groundwater monitoring wells and piezometers on site. Electrical conductivity (EC) is the relative ability of earth material to transmit a current. As discussed in Teeple (2017, p. 6), “The electrical properties of soil and rock are determined by water content, porosity, clay content, and conductivity (reciprocal of electrical resistivity) of the pore water (Lucius and others, 2007).***Electrical changes detected within the subsurface also reflect changes that occur within the hydrogeology.” Prior to installing a groundwater monitoring well, a borehole EC log was collected by using direct-push technology (DPT) whereby a machine is used to push sampling tools, instruments, and sensors into the subsurface without the need for a rotary drill to remove the soil (Kejr, Inc., 2023a). Typically, DPT machines rely on static weight and percussive energy to help advance the tool (Kejr, Inc., 2023a). A 1.5-inch diameter Geoprobe EC sensor (Kejr, Inc., 2023b) is at the tip of the DPT drive-head device and uses an array of four electrodes (two transmitter [Tx] electrodes and two receiver [Rx] electrodes) to measure EC of the soil in millisiemens per meter as it is pushed into the subsurface (Teeple, 2017). A known current was transmitted into the subsurface through the Tx electrodes, and the resulting electrical potential was measured as a voltage change between the two Rx electrodes (Teeple, 2017). Using the known current, the measured voltage values, and the geometric factor dependent on the array, a conductivity value was calculated by using Ohm’s law (Teeple, 2017). For this study, EC values were typically lower in coarse-grained sediments such as sand or gravel than in fine-grained sediments such as clay and silt or sediment contaminated with previously refined or stored products at the site. EC logs were terminated at a depth of 20 feet (ft) or at the depth of refusal as a result of encountering either well-lithified sandstones or hard, dense clay or mudstone units (EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC, 2020). Depth of refusal was defined as the point at which the hammer or other tool used to drill the borehole failed to advance the borehole as additional blows were applied by the tool to the rock being removed (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 2023). The encountered sandstones or mudstone units are generally related to the sandstones and mudstones of the Barnsdall Formation (Stanley, 2017), and therefore, the depth of refusal is interpreted as the depth to the top of the Barnsdall Formation. The total depth of 20 ft was selected because the focus of this study was the shallow perched groundwater system within the alluvium, and the depth to groundwater was typically no more than 15 ft; the intent was to have at least a 5-ft screen interval below the top of the groundwater table. Data were not collected or were unusable because of issues with the EC probe at wells USGS-12, USGS-19, and USGS-23. Teeple (2017) Lucius and others (2007) Kejr, Inc. (2023a) Kejr, Inc. (2023b) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2023) Stanley (2017) EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC (2020) 20230109 Andrew P. Teeple U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologist mailing and physical

10207-B East 61st Street

Tulsa OK 74133 USA 325-226-0601 apteeple@usgs.gov Directly adjacent to the electrical conductivity borehole, a 1.5-inch diameter soil core was collected to the same depth, if possible. The variability of consolidated sediments resulted in varying depths of penetration even if the tool was moved just a few feet; depths typically varied between the EC borehole and adjacent soil core by about 0.5 to 1 ft, but greater differences sometimes occurred. The soil core was segmented into lithologic units wherein each segment that was discernable from the unit above and below was individually described for color, grain size, and sorting by using field charts based on methods outlined in Wentworth (1922), Shepard (1954), Compton (1962), Schlee (1973), Folk (1980), Munsell Color Co., Inc. (1992), and Poppe and others (2005). The soil-core descriptions were described on site and then later digitized to a machine-readable text file. A photoionization detector (PID) was used to monitor the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during groundwater monitoring well installation. VOC off-gassing was monitored throughout the drilling and soil-core description processes. The VOC concentration values detected were used to determine the severity of contamination at each location where a groundwater monitoring well was installed at the site. The PID was used only to detect general VOCs, so the presence of specific VOCs was not determined during groundwater monitoring well installation. The VOC concentration and saturation was noted in the soil-core description. Once a groundwater monitoring well was installed, the soil core was disposed of properly, as it contained contaminants from the subsurface alluvium. Wentworth (1922) Shepard (1954) Compton (1962) Schlee (1973) Folk (1980) Munsell Color Co., Inc. (1992) Poppe and others (2005) 20230509 Andrew P. Teeple U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologist mailing address

10207-B East 61st Street

Tulsa OK 74145 US 325-226-0601 apteeple@usgs.gov After collecting the soil core, the Geoprobe direct-push technology drilling system was used to install the groundwater monitoring well; each groundwater monitoring well was installed by directly pushing a 3.25-inch (in.) outer diameter rod with an expendable point down the same hole where the soil core was collected. After reaching the desired depth, the prepacked screens (Kejr, Inc., 2023c) and 1.5-in. polyvinyl chloride (PVC) risers were placed inside the 3.25-in. rod, with the screens placed at an optimal depth for groundwater sampling. The prepacked screens were made of slotted PVC wrapped in sand and stainless-steel mesh (Kejr, Inc., 2023c). The outer diameter of the screens is 2.5 in. with an inner diameter of 1.5 in. (Kejr, Inc. 2023c). The prepacked screens were secured in the borehole with 20/40 mesh sand (more than 90 percent of the sand grains by weight are between 0.85 and 0.425 millimeter) (Zheng and Tannant, 2016). Annular sealing was completed by using sodium bentonite pellets (0.25- to 0.75-in. size) starting from about 0.5 feet (ft) above the top of the screen to about 2 ft below land surface. The surface seal was completed with concrete from land surface to a depth of about 2 ft below land surface. A 3 by 3-ft square concrete pad was installed flush with land surface at each groundwater monitoring well having a thickness of about 4 in. Well construction information was noted in the field and then later digitized to a machine-readable text file. Each groundwater monitoring well was geospatially referenced with coordinates collected from a real-time kinematic (RTK) Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. Kejr, Inc. (2023c) Zheng and Tannant (2016) 20230602 Andrew P. Teeple U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologist mailing address

10207-B East 61st Street

Tulsa OK 74145 US 325-226-0601 apteeple@usgs.gov Universal Transverse Mercator 14 0.9996 -99.0 0.0 500000.0 0.0 coordinate pair 0.01 0.01 meters North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Geodetic Reference System 1980 6378137.000000 298.257222 North American Vertical Datum of 1988 0.1 feet Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates Local surface 0.01 feet Explicit depth coordinate included with horizontal coordinates Wilcox_RTK_RawData.zip Zip folder containing the raw data files for fast static real-time kinematic (RTK) Global Positioning System (GPS) occupations for each groundwater monitoring well and piezometer in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas in the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site. The binary (DAT and T01) files are proprietary files generated by the Trimble GPS data collection hardware that need the ConvertToRinex software to convert them into ACSII files. The resulting converted ASCII files (22G, 22N, and 22O) are in Receiver Independent Exchange (RINEX) version 2.11 format. More information on the RINEX format is found in the RINEX211.txt file. The first 8 digits of the filename represents a naming convention given to the file by the RTK GPS receiver followed by an underscore and the identifier for the well where the data were collected where hyphens are represented as underscores. Producer Defined Wilcox_Well_Conductivity.csv Comma Separated Value (CSV) file containing the rate of penetration, conductivity, and resistivity logging data for the specified wells in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas of the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site. Producer Defined Well_ID Identifier for the specified well. Producer Defined Identifier for specified well. Depth The depth in feet below land surface at which the measurement was made in the borehole adjacent to the specified well. Producer Defined 0.00 21.05 feet 0.01 ROP The rate in feet per minute at which the direct-push drilling tool was penetrating the subsurface at the specified "Depth" in the borehole adjacent to the specified well. Producer Defined 0.00 25.35 feet per minute 0.01 Conductivity The conductivity value in millisiemens per meter measured at the specified "Depth" in the borehole adjacent to the specified well. Producer Defined -999 Conductivity was not measured at the specified "Depth." Producer defined 0.0 184.5 millisiemens per meter 0.1 Resistivity The resistivity value in ohm-meters measured at the specified "Depth" in the borehole adjacent to the specified well. Producer Defined -999 Resistivity was not measured at the specified "Depth." Producer defined 5.4 100000.0 ohm-meters 0.1 Wilcox_Well_Descriptions.csv Comma Separated Value (CSV) file containing the color, sorting, and lithologic codes and descriptions for the specified wells in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas of the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site. Producer Defined Well_ID Identifier for the specified well. Producer Defined Identifier for specified well. Top_depth The depth in feet below land surface to the top of the lithologic section within the specified well. Producer Defined 0.0 21.3 feet 0.1 Bottom_depth The depth in feet below land surface to the bottom of the lithologic section within the specified well. Producer Defined 0.2 23.0 feet 0.1 Munsell_color The color of the specified lithologic section within the specified well as defined by Munsell Color Co., Inc. (1992). Producer Defined The Munsell color is split into three parts: hue, value, and chroma. The "hue" refers to the color of the soil and is represented as number and letter codes. The "value" refers to how light or dark the color is with larger numbers representing lighter colors and is identified as the numerator in the fraction. The "chroma" refers to how weak or strong the color is with larger numbers representing stronger colors and is identified as the denominator in the fraction. To see colors associated with the lithologic sections within the specified well, cross-reference the color codes with Munsell Color Co., Inc. (1992). Description The detailed description of the specified lithologic section within the specified well as described by the on-site geologist. Producer Defined A detailed description of the lithologic section including color, soil type, grade, consolidation, and other details observed within the section. Sorting Assessment of the grain size distribution (sorting) of the specified lithologic section within the specified well as defined by Compton (1962). Producer Defined moderate More than one grain size is present, but one is more persistent than the others. Producer defined moderately well More than one grain size is present, but more grains are about the same size relative to "moderate" sorting. Producer defined well Most grains are about the same size. Producer defined poor Several grain sizes are present, none of which are noticeably more persistent than the others Producer defined Lithology The lithology and grain size of the specified lithologic section of the specified well. Producer Defined The lithologic description, or soil classification, of the lithologic section including predominant grain sizes. Lithology_code A shortened representation of the "Lithology" based on a Shepard's classification system (Shepard, 1954) modified by Schlee (1973) and Poppe and others (2005) of the specified lithologic section of the specified well. Producer Defined sand and gravel The lithologic section contains less than 50 percent and equal to or greater than 10 percent gravel and at least 37.5 percent sand. Producer defined clayey silt The lithologic section contains less than 75 percent and equal to or greater than 50 percent silt, clay greater than sand, and sand less than 20 percent. Producer defined clayey sand The lithologic section contains less than 75 percent and equal to or greater than 50 percent sand, clay greater than silt, and silt less than 20 percent. Producer defined silt and clay The lithologic section contains equal parts of silt and clay and sand is less than 20 percent. Producer defined clay The lithologic section contains greater than or equal to 75 percent clay. Producer defined sand and clay The lithologic section contains equal parts of sand and clay and silt is less than 20 percent. Producer defined sand The lithologic section contains greater than or equal to 75 percent sand. Producer defined silty clay The lithologic section contains less than 75 percent and equal to or greater than 50 percent clay, silt greater than sand, and sand less than 20 percent. Producer defined sandy clay The lithologic section contains less than 75 percent and equal to or greater than 50 percent clay, sand greater than silt, and silt less than 20 percent. Producer defined silt The lithologic section contains equal to or greater than 75 percent silt. Producer defined sand and silt The lithologic section contains equal parts of sand and silt and clay is less than 20 percent. Producer defined sandy silt The lithologic section contains less than 75 percent and equal to or greater than 50 percent silt, sand greater than clay, and clay less than 20 percent. Producer defined Lithology_group The lithologic grouping showing the dominant soil type between sand and clay of the specified lithologic section of the installed groundwater monitoring well. Producer Defined sand dominant The dominant soil type in the lithologic section is sand. Producer defined clay dominant The dominant soil type in the lithologic section is clay. Producer defined sand and clay mix There is no dominant soil type in the lithologic section. Producer defined Saturation Indicates if the specified lithologic section in the specified well was saturated with water. Producer Defined No The lithologic section was not saturated with water. Producer defined Yes The lithologic section was saturated with water. Producer defined VOC The measured composite volatile organic compound concentration in parts per million (ppm) measured in gases emitted from the soil core associated with the specified lithologic section in the specified well by using a photoionization detector. A value of 0 ppm represents a non-detection of volatile organic compounds with a concentration of less than 0.001 ppm. Producer Defined -999 The volatile organic compound concentration was not measured for the specified lithologic section. Producer defined 0.000 478.000 parts per million 0.001 Files pertaining to this dataset are listed as follows: Wilcox_RTK_RawData.zip - Zip folder containing the raw data files for fast static real-time kinematic (RTK) Global Positioning System (GPS) occupations for each groundwater monitoring well and piezometer in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas of the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site. Wilcox_Well_Conductivity.csv - Comma Separated Value (CSV) file containing the rate of penetration, conductivity, and resistivity logging data for the specified wells in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas of the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site. Wilcox_Well_Descriptions.csv - Comma Separated Value (CSV) file containing the color, sorting, and lithologic codes and descriptions for the installed groundwater monitoring wells in the Wilcox and Lorraine process areas of the Wilcox Oil Company Superfund site. Wilcox_WellInstallation_meta.xml - Metadata file containing data quality information, processing steps, entity and attributes information, and other pertinent information. Wilcox_WellInstallation_meta.xml GS ScienceBase U.S. Geological Survey mailing address

Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Mail Stop 302

Denver CO 80225 United States 1-888-275-8747 sciencebase@usgs.gov Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Digital Data https://doi.org/10.5066/P9FR2ZF6 None 20260320 Andrew P. Teeple U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologist mailing

10207-B East 61st Street

Tulsa OK 74145 US 325-226-0601 apteeple@usgs.gov FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998