<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <idinfo>
    <citation>
      <citeinfo>
        <origin>Gurley, L.N.</origin>
        <origin>Hopkins, K.G.</origin>
        <origin>Stillwell, C.C.</origin>
        <pubdate>20230411</pubdate>
        <title>Positive openness rasters for the Greater Raleigh Area, North Carolina</title>
        <geoform>raster digital data</geoform>
        <pubinfo>
          <pubplace>ScienceBase Catalog</pubplace>
          <publish>U.S. Geological Survey</publish>
        </pubinfo>
        <onlink>https://doi.org/10.5066/P9V1J754</onlink>
      </citeinfo>
    </citation>
    <descript>
      <abstract>Rasters of positive openness and positive openness difference in the Greater Raleigh, NC Area based on 1-meter high-resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models (DEMs). This dataset contains positive openness rasters for 2013, 2015, and 2022 and one positive openness difference raster. The positive openness difference raster represents the difference in positive openness values between the years 2015 and 2022. The 2015 and 2022 positive openness rasters were selected for differencing because of the superior quality level (QL2) of base lidar data used to develop the positive openness rasters compared with the poorer quality level (QL3) of base lidar data used to develop the 2013 positive openness raster. Positive openness uses a line-of-sight approach to measure the surrounding sixteen zenith angles viewed above the landscape surface out to a specified distance. The raster cell value represents the average of all sixteen angles. A positive openness value of 90 degrees indicates a flat surface. Positive openness values less than 90 degrees indicate varying degrees of concavity; positive openness values greater than 90 degrees indicate varying degrees of convexity. Positive openness was calculated with the Relief Visualization Toolbox v 2.2.1 (https://www.zrc-sazu.si/en/rvt) with the search radius set to 18 meters (approximately 60 feet). All files are available as Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF, meaning they are formatted to work on the cloud or can be directly downloaded.</abstract>
      <purpose>These datasets were developed as part of a collaborative study between the U.S. Geological Survey and City of Raleigh, North Carolina, to help identify stream reaches throughout the Greater Raleigh, NC Area that may be most susceptible to streambank erosion.</purpose>
    </descript>
    <timeperd>
      <timeinfo>
        <rngdates>
          <begdate>2013</begdate>
          <enddate>2022</enddate>
        </rngdates>
      </timeinfo>
      <current>ground condition</current>
    </timeperd>
    <status>
      <progress>Complete</progress>
      <update>None planned</update>
    </status>
    <spdom>
      <bounding>
        <westbc>-78.8726</westbc>
        <eastbc>-78.4390</eastbc>
        <northbc>36.0404</northbc>
        <southbc>35.6924</southbc>
      </bounding>
    </spdom>
    <keywords>
      <theme>
        <themekt>ISO 19115 Topic Category</themekt>
        <themekey>environment</themekey>
        <themekey>geoscientificInformation</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>USGS Thesaurus</themekt>
        <themekey>geomorphology</themekey>
        <themekey>geography</themekey>
        <themekey>hydrology</themekey>
        <themekey>erosion</themekey>
        <themekey>topography</themekey>
        <themekey>geospatial datasets</themekey>
        <themekey>lidar</themekey>
        <themekey>land surface characteristics</themekey>
        <themekey>geospatial analysis</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>USGS Metadata Identifier</themekt>
        <themekey>USGS:63501f75d34e47431c15c18e</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>None</themekt>
        <themekey>positive openness</themekey>
      </theme>
      <place>
        <placekt>Common Geographic Areas</placekt>
        <placekey>North Carolina</placekey>
        <placekey>Wake</placekey>
        <placekey>Raleigh</placekey>
        <placekey>Upper Neuse</placekey>
      </place>
    </keywords>
    <accconst>None.  Please see 'Distribution Info' for details.</accconst>
    <useconst>None.  Users are advised to read the dataset's metadata thoroughly to understand appropriate use and data limitations.</useconst>
    <ptcontac>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntperp>
          <cntper>Laura N Gurley</cntper>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey, SOUTHEAST REGION</cntorg>
        </cntperp>
        <cntpos>Hydrologist</cntpos>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
          <address>3916 Sunset Ridge Rd</address>
          <city>Raleigh</city>
          <state>NC</state>
          <postal>27607</postal>
          <country>US</country>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>919-571-4014</cntvoice>
        <cntfax>919-571-4041</cntfax>
        <cntemail>lgurley@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </ptcontac>
    <datacred>City of Raleigh, North Carolina</datacred>
    <crossref>
      <citeinfo>
        <origin>Charles C. Stillwell</origin>
        <origin>Ryan B. Rasmussen</origin>
        <origin>Laura N. Gurley</origin>
        <origin>Kristina G. Hopkins</origin>
        <pubdate>20220908</pubdate>
        <title>Datasets for Rapid Assessment of Streambank Erosion Potential for Selected Streams throughout the Greater Raleigh Area, North Carolina, 2022</title>
        <geoform>tabular digital data</geoform>
        <pubinfo>
          <pubplace>ScienceBase Catalog</pubplace>
          <publish>U.S. Geological Survey</publish>
        </pubinfo>
        <onlink>https://doi.org/10.5066/P97JBT2T</onlink>
      </citeinfo>
    </crossref>
  </idinfo>
  <dataqual>
    <attracc>
      <attraccr>No formal attribute accuracy tests were conducted.</attraccr>
    </attracc>
    <logic>No formal logical accuracy tests were conducted.</logic>
    <complete>Dataset is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details.</complete>
    <posacc>
      <horizpa>
        <horizpar>No formal positional accuracy tests were conducted</horizpar>
      </horizpa>
      <vertacc>
        <vertaccr>No formal positional accuracy tests were conducted</vertaccr>
      </vertacc>
    </posacc>
    <lineage>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Žiga Kokalj</origin>
            <origin>Maja Somrak</origin>
            <pubdate>2019</pubdate>
            <title>Why Not a Single Image? Combining Visualizations to Facilitate Fieldwork and On-Screen Mapping</title>
            <edition>1(7)</edition>
            <geoform>application/service</geoform>
            <othercit>Remote Sensing</othercit>
            <onlink>https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070747</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>2019</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Kokalj and Somrak, 2019</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Remote Sensing</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Klemen Zakšek</origin>
            <origin>Kristof Oštir</origin>
            <origin>Žiga Kokalj</origin>
            <pubdate>2011</pubdate>
            <title>Sky-View Factor as a Relief Visualization Technique</title>
            <edition>3(2)</edition>
            <geoform>publication</geoform>
            <othercit>Remote Sensing</othercit>
            <onlink>https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3020398</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>2011</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Zakšek et al. 2011</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Remote Sensing</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Ryuzo Yokoyama</origin>
            <origin>Michio Shirasawa</origin>
            <origin>Richard J. Pike</origin>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <title>Visualizing Topography by Openness: A New Application of Image Processing to Digital Elevation Models</title>
            <edition>68(3)</edition>
            <geoform>publication</geoform>
            <othercit>Photogrammetric Engineering &amp; Remote Sensing</othercit>
            <onlink>https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/2002journal/march/2002_mar_257-265.pdf</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>2002</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Yokoyama et al. 2002</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Photogrammetric Engineering &amp; Remote Sensing</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <procstep>
        <procdesc>Positive openness rasters were generated from1-meter (m) high-resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) of the Greater Raleigh Area, North Carolina for 2013, 2015, and 2022. Positive openness uses a line-of-sight approach to measure the surrounding 16 zenith angles viewed above the landscape surface out to a specified distance (Yokoyama et al. 2002). All processing steps were identical for each year. Positive openness rasters were generated at 1-m resolution by inputting the 1-m DEM into the Relief Visualization Toolbox v 2.2.1 (https://www.zrc-sazu.si/en/rvt; Zakšek et al. 2011; Kokalj and Somrak, 2019) and setting the search radius to 18 m (approximately 60 feet) and setting the number of search directions to 16. Each raster cell value represents the average angle of the sixteen surrounding directions. An angle of 90 degrees indicates a flat surface, while angles less than 90 degrees indicate varying degrees of concavity, and angles greater than 90 degrees would indicate varying degrees of convexity. 

The 2015 and 2022 positive openness rasters were selected for differencing because of the superior quality level (QL2) of base lidar data used to develop the positive openness rasters compared with the poorer quality level (QL3) of base lidar data used to develop the 2013 positive openness raster. The  positive openness difference raster was generated using raster calculator in ArcMap v 10.7.1 (ESRI) by subtracting the 2015 positive openness raster from the 2022 positive openness raster. Positive raster cell values in the positive openness difference raster indicate that the positive openness value was lower in 2015 than in 2022 and that there was an increase in concavity between the two years. Negative raster cell values in the positive openness difference raster indicate that positive openness value was greater in 2015 than in 2022 and that there was an increase in convexity between the two years.</procdesc>
        <srcused>Yokoyama et al. 2002</srcused>
        <srcused>Zakšek et al. 2011</srcused>
        <srcused>Kokalj and Somrak, 2019</srcused>
        <procdate>2023</procdate>
        <proccont>
          <cntinfo>
            <cntperp>
              <cntper>Laura N Gurley</cntper>
              <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey, SOUTHEAST REGION</cntorg>
            </cntperp>
            <cntpos>Hydrologist</cntpos>
            <cntaddr>
              <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
              <address>3916 Sunset Ridge Rd</address>
              <city>Raleigh</city>
              <state>NC</state>
              <postal>27607</postal>
              <country>US</country>
            </cntaddr>
            <cntvoice>919-571-4014</cntvoice>
            <cntfax>919-571-4041</cntfax>
            <cntemail>lgurley@usgs.gov</cntemail>
          </cntinfo>
        </proccont>
      </procstep>
    </lineage>
  </dataqual>
  <spdoinfo>
    <direct>Raster</direct>
    <rastinfo>
      <rasttype>Grid Cell</rasttype>
      <rowcount>38468</rowcount>
      <colcount>39024</colcount>
    </rastinfo>
  </spdoinfo>
  <spref>
    <horizsys>
      <planar>
        <gridsys>
          <gridsysn>State Plane Coordinate System 1983</gridsysn>
          <spcs>
            <spcszone>3200</spcszone>
            <transmer>
              <sfctrmer>1</sfctrmer>
              <longcm>-79</longcm>
              <latprjo>33.75</latprjo>
              <feast>609601.22</feast>
              <fnorth>0.0</fnorth>
            </transmer>
          </spcs>
        </gridsys>
        <planci>
          <plance>row and column</plance>
          <coordrep>
            <absres>1</absres>
            <ordres>1</ordres>
          </coordrep>
          <plandu>meters</plandu>
        </planci>
      </planar>
      <geodetic>
        <horizdn>North_American_Datum_1983</horizdn>
        <ellips>GRS 1980</ellips>
        <semiaxis>6378137.0</semiaxis>
        <denflat>298.257222101</denflat>
      </geodetic>
    </horizsys>
  </spref>
  <eainfo>
    <detailed>
      <enttyp>
        <enttypl>PositiveOpenness_2013.tif</enttypl>
        <enttypd>Raster geospatial data file.</enttypd>
        <enttypds>Producer Defined</enttypds>
      </enttyp>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Value</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Unique numeric values contained in each raster cell.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>-3.40282306074e+038</edomv>
            <edomvd>Value that indicates no data.</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>7.4</rdommin>
            <rdommax>134.5</rdommax>
            <attrunit>degrees</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
    </detailed>
    <detailed>
      <enttyp>
        <enttypl>PositiveOpenness_2015.tif</enttypl>
        <enttypd>Raster geospatial data file.</enttypd>
        <enttypds>Producer Defined</enttypds>
      </enttyp>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Value</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Unique numeric values contained in each raster cell.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>-3.40282306074e+038</edomv>
            <edomvd>Value that indicates no data.</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>3.2</rdommin>
            <rdommax>125</rdommax>
            <attrunit>degrees</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
    </detailed>
    <detailed>
      <enttyp>
        <enttypl>PositiveOpenness_2022.tif</enttypl>
        <enttypd>Raster geospatial data file.</enttypd>
        <enttypds>Producer Defined</enttypds>
      </enttyp>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Value</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Unique numeric values contained in each raster cell.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>-3.40282306074e+038</edomv>
            <edomvd>Value that indicates no data.</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>18</rdommin>
            <rdommax>129.4</rdommax>
            <attrunit>degrees</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
    </detailed>
    <detailed>
      <enttyp>
        <enttypl>PositiveOpennessDif_2015-2022.tif</enttypl>
        <enttypd>Raster geospatial data file.</enttypd>
        <enttypds>Producer Defined</enttypds>
      </enttyp>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Value</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Unique numeric values contained in each raster cell.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>-3.40282306074e+038</edomv>
            <edomvd>Value that indicates no data.</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>-73.5</rdommin>
            <rdommax>85.1</rdommax>
            <attrunit>degrees</attrunit>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
    </detailed>
    <overview>
      <eaover>Rasters of positive openness and positive openness difference in the Greater Raleigh Area based on 1-meter high-resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models in 2013, 2015, and 2022.</eaover>
      <eadetcit>Laura N. Gurley, Kristina G. Hopkins, and Charles C. Stillwell, 2023, Lidar-derived rasters of point density, elevation, and geomorphological features for 2013, 2015, and 2022 for the Greater Raleigh Area, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9V1J754.</eadetcit>
    </overview>
  </eainfo>
  <distinfo>
    <distrib>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntorgp>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey</cntorg>
          <cntper>GS ScienceBase</cntper>
        </cntorgp>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
          <address>Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Mail Stop 302</address>
          <city>Denver</city>
          <state>CO</state>
          <postal>80225</postal>
          <country>United States</country>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>1-888-275-8747</cntvoice>
        <cntemail>sciencebase@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </distrib>
    <distliab>Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.</distliab>
    <stdorder>
      <digform>
        <digtinfo>
          <formname>Digital Data</formname>
        </digtinfo>
        <digtopt>
          <onlinopt>
            <computer>
              <networka>
                <networkr>https://doi.org/10.5066/10.5066/P9V1J754</networkr>
              </networka>
            </computer>
          </onlinopt>
        </digtopt>
      </digform>
      <fees>None</fees>
    </stdorder>
  </distinfo>
  <metainfo>
    <metd>20230411</metd>
    <metc>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntperp>
          <cntper>Laura N Gurley</cntper>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey, SOUTHEAST REGION</cntorg>
        </cntperp>
        <cntpos>Hydrologist</cntpos>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
          <address>3916 Sunset Ridge Rd</address>
          <city>Raleigh</city>
          <state>NC</state>
          <postal>27607</postal>
          <country>US</country>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>919-571-4014</cntvoice>
        <cntfax>919-571-4041</cntfax>
        <cntemail>lgurley@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </metc>
    <metstdn>FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata</metstdn>
    <metstdv>FGDC-STD-001-1998</metstdv>
  </metainfo>
</metadata>
