<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <idinfo>
    <citation>
      <citeinfo>
        <origin>Gordon C. Reese</origin>
        <origin>Sarah K. Carter</origin>
        <pubdate>2019</pubdate>
        <title>Potential suitable habitat for Ash Meadows gum-plant (Grindelia fraxinipratensis) in the California desert</title>
        <geoform>raster digital data</geoform>
        <onlink>https://doi.org/10.5066/P9NDA9YC</onlink>
        <lworkcit>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Gordon C. Reese</origin>
            <origin>Sarah K. Carter</origin>
            <origin>Christina Lund</origin>
            <origin>Steven Walterscheid</origin>
            <pubdate>20190419</pubdate>
            <title>Evaluating and using existing models to map probable suitable habitat for rare plants to inform management of multiple-use public lands in the California desert</title>
            <geoform>publication</geoform>
            <serinfo>
              <sername>PLOS ONE</sername>
              <issue>vol. 14, issue 4</issue>
            </serinfo>
            <pubinfo>
              <pubplace>n/a</pubplace>
              <publish>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</publish>
            </pubinfo>
            <othercit>ppg. e0214099</othercit>
            <onlink>https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214099</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </lworkcit>
      </citeinfo>
    </citation>
    <descript>
      <abstract>Here we present the map of potential suitable habitat for Ash Meadows gum-plant (Grindelia fraxinipratensis). The data indicate both how many models predicted each location to be potentially suitable for the species and the average standardized habitat suitability score for each location.Data are presented at a spatial resolution of 10 m pixels, which was required to harmonize the original model inputs. However, maps of suitable habitat should be used at a resolution no smaller than 360 m (i.e., 36 pixels x 36 pixels), which corresponds with the resolution of the coarsest model input. These data are intended to be used only to target future plant surveys in areas where new occurrences are most likely to benefit future habitat modelling efforts. Complete methods and other additional information are provided in the article associated with this data release (Reese and others, 2019).</abstract>
      <purpose>These data were developed to provide maps of probable and potential suitable habitat for 43 rare plants in the California desert to inform future planning and management actions undertaken by the Bureau of Land Management and others.</purpose>
      <supplinf>RarePlants_NamesCodesMapAvailability.pdf</supplinf>
    </descript>
    <timeperd>
      <timeinfo>
        <rngdates>
          <begdate>1981</begdate>
          <enddate>2012</enddate>
        </rngdates>
      </timeinfo>
      <current>Habitat suitability model evaluation points</current>
    </timeperd>
    <status>
      <progress>Complete</progress>
      <update>None planned</update>
    </status>
    <spdom>
      <bounding>
        <westbc>-118.7545</westbc>
        <eastbc>-114.0061</eastbc>
        <northbc>37.6713</northbc>
        <southbc>32.5901</southbc>
      </bounding>
      <descgeog>California desert</descgeog>
    </spdom>
    <keywords>
      <theme>
        <themekt>ISO 19115 Topic Category</themekt>
        <themekey>biota</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>None</themekt>
        <themekey>species distribution model</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>USGS Metadata Identifier</themekt>
        <themekey>USGS:5c99654fe4b0b8a7f62891a8</themekey>
      </theme>
      <place>
        <placekt>None</placekt>
        <placekey>California</placekey>
      </place>
    </keywords>
    <accconst>None.  Please see 'Distribution Info' for details.</accconst>
    <useconst>None.  Users are advised to read the data set's metadata thoroughly to understand appropriate use and data limitations.</useconst>
    <ptcontac>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntperp>
          <cntper>Sarah K Carter</cntper>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Region</cntorg>
        </cntperp>
        <cntpos>Scientist</cntpos>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
          <address>2150 Centre Avenue Bldg C</address>
          <city>Fort Collins</city>
          <state>CO</state>
          <postal>80526</postal>
          <country>United States</country>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>970-226-9355</cntvoice>
        <cntfax>970-226-9230</cntfax>
        <cntemail>skcarter@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </ptcontac>
  </idinfo>
  <dataqual>
    <attracc>
      <attraccr>Data were reviewed to ensure that there were no typos, that the data types were correct, and that there were no unreasonable values.</attraccr>
    </attracc>
    <logic>Data were checked to ensure that projections and boundaries were as expected.</logic>
    <complete>We believe data are complete across the boundary.</complete>
    <posacc>
      <horizpa>
        <horizpar>Data are presented as 10 m resolution, resampled from source data that are 30-360 m in resolution</horizpar>
      </horizpa>
      <vertacc>
        <vertaccr>NA</vertaccr>
      </vertacc>
    </posacc>
    <lineage>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Christina Lund</origin>
            <pubdate>2015</pubdate>
            <title>Existing habitat models</title>
            <geoform>raster digital data</geoform>
            <othercit>Reports and data were obtained from:State Botanist, Bureau of Land Management, California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825, phone: 916.978.4638Reports: BIO-WEST Inc. Rare plant modeling in California’s Mojave Desert draft report. Prepared for Christina Lund, State Botanist, Bureau of Land Management. 2014. Available from Bureau of Land Management California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA, 95825.ECORP Consulting Inc. Rare plant modeling report, Prepared for Bureau of Land Management California State Office. 2015. Available from Bureau of Land Management California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA, 95825.Frank D, Kreitler J, Soong O, Stoms D, Dashiell S, Schloss C, Hannah L, Wilkinson W, Dingman J (University of California, Santa Barbara). Cumulative biological impacts framework for solar energy projects in the California desert. California Energy Commission; 2013 Dec. Report No.: CEC-500-2015-062. Contract No.: 500-10-021.Moore KA, McIntyre PJ (University of California, Davis). Enhancing rare desert plant mapping for conservation amid renewable energy planning. California Energy Commission; 2014 Sep. Report No.: CEC-500-2016-009. Contract No.: 500-10-017.</othercit>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <rngdates>
              <begdate>2012</begdate>
              <enddate>2015</enddate>
            </rngdates>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Existing habitat models</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Existing models used to map probable and potential suitable habitat.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>California Natural Diversity Database</origin>
            <pubdate>2018</pubdate>
            <title>California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB).</title>
            <geoform>vector digital data</geoform>
            <othercit>California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, California (June 20, 2018 version).</othercit>
            <onlink>https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/data/cnddb</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>2018</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>observed</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>CNDDB</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Observation locations for rare plant species used to evaluate existing habitat models and maps of probable suitable habitat.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>US Geological Survey</origin>
            <pubdate>2018</pubdate>
            <title>National Hydrography Dataset for the State of California</title>
            <geoform>vector digital data</geoform>
            <othercit>Accessed 29 June 2018</othercit>
            <onlink>http://prd-tnm.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/?prefix=StagedProducts/Hydrography/NHD/State/HighResolution/GDB/</onlink>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>2018</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>NHD</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Used to exclude (mask out) the Salton Sea from areas of probable and potential suitable habitat.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <srcinfo>
        <srccite>
          <citeinfo>
            <origin>Davis F, Soong O (University of California, Santa Barbara)</origin>
            <pubdate>2014</pubdate>
            <title>Additional existing habitat models for rare plants in the California desert</title>
            <geoform>raster digital data</geoform>
            <othercit>Data available from https://databasin.org/datasets/ by searching on each rare plant species name.Related report: Davis F, Soong O (University of California, Santa Barbara). Species distribution models, DRECP [Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan]. 2014 Oct. Report available from State Botanist, Bureau of Land Management, California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825, phone: 916.978.4638.</othercit>
          </citeinfo>
        </srccite>
        <typesrc>Digital and/or Hardcopy</typesrc>
        <srctime>
          <timeinfo>
            <sngdate>
              <caldate>2014</caldate>
            </sngdate>
          </timeinfo>
          <srccurr>publication date</srccurr>
        </srctime>
        <srccitea>Additional existing habitat models</srccitea>
        <srccontr>Existing models used to map probable and potential suitable habitat.</srccontr>
      </srcinfo>
      <procstep>
        <procdesc>We mapped potential suitable habitat for this and all species using existing habitat models as follows. Potential suitable habitat maps: We used models not used to map the outer boundary of probable suitable habitat to map potential suitable habitat (Reese and others, 2019). We modified the existing (input) models to meet the target 80% occurrence capture rate whenever possible. The union of these models became the initial map of potential suitable habitat. The map was then masked to exclude an area of permanent water (the Salton Sea) using the US Geological Survey National Hydrography Dataset.Each final map of potential suitable habitat indicates both how many models predicted each location to be potentially suitable for that species and the average standardized habitat suitability score for each location. Please also refer to the journal article associated with this data release (Reese and others, 2019).</procdesc>
        <procdate>20180711</procdate>
      </procstep>
    </lineage>
  </dataqual>
  <spdoinfo>
    <direct>Raster</direct>
    <rastinfo>
      <rasttype>Grid Cell</rasttype>
      <rowcount>66528</rowcount>
      <colcount>55377</colcount>
      <vrtcount>1</vrtcount>
    </rastinfo>
  </spdoinfo>
  <spref>
    <horizsys>
      <planar>
        <gridsys>
          <gridsysn>Universal Transverse Mercator</gridsysn>
          <utm>
            <utmzone>11</utmzone>
            <transmer>
              <sfctrmer>0.9996</sfctrmer>
              <longcm>-117.0</longcm>
              <latprjo>0.0</latprjo>
              <feast>500000.0</feast>
              <fnorth>0.0</fnorth>
            </transmer>
          </utm>
        </gridsys>
        <planci>
          <plance>row and column</plance>
          <coordrep>
            <absres>10.0</absres>
            <ordres>10.0</ordres>
          </coordrep>
          <plandu>meters</plandu>
        </planci>
      </planar>
      <geodetic>
        <horizdn>North_American_Datum_1983</horizdn>
        <ellips>GRS 1980</ellips>
        <semiaxis>6378137.0</semiaxis>
        <denflat>298.2572221010042</denflat>
      </geodetic>
    </horizsys>
  </spref>
  <eainfo>
    <detailed>
      <enttyp>
        <enttypl>GRFR_PotentialSuitableHabitat.tif</enttypl>
        <enttypd>Raster geospatial data file.</enttypd>
        <enttypds>Producer Defined</enttypds>
      </enttyp>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>OID</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Internal object identifier.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>System Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <udom>Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.</udom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Value</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Unique numeric values contained in each raster cell.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>System Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>1</rdommin>
            <rdommax>203</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Count</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The number of cells in the raster dataset with the cell value in the Value column</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>System Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>99.0</rdommin>
            <rdommax>4895239.0</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>NumModels</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Number of models predicting suitable habitat</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>1</rdommin>
            <rdommax>3</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>AvgSuit</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Average standardized habitat suitability score</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Producer Defined</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>-9</edomv>
            <edomvd>unknown value based on a lack of information in the source data</edomvd>
            <edomvds>Producer defined</edomvds>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
        <attrdomv>
          <rdom>
            <rdommin>8</rdommin>
            <rdommax>89</rdommax>
          </rdom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
    </detailed>
  </eainfo>
  <distinfo>
    <distrib>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntperp>
          <cntper>GS ScienceBase</cntper>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey</cntorg>
        </cntperp>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
          <address>Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Mail Stop 302</address>
          <city>Denver</city>
          <state>CO</state>
          <postal>80225</postal>
          <country>United States</country>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>1-888-275-8747</cntvoice>
        <cntemail>sciencebase@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </distrib>
    <distliab>Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.</distliab>
    <stdorder>
      <digform>
        <digtinfo>
          <formname>Digital Data</formname>
        </digtinfo>
        <digtopt>
          <onlinopt>
            <computer>
              <networka>
                <networkr>https://doi.org/10.5066/P9NDA9YC</networkr>
              </networka>
            </computer>
          </onlinopt>
        </digtopt>
      </digform>
      <fees>None</fees>
    </stdorder>
  </distinfo>
  <metainfo>
    <metd>20200820</metd>
    <metc>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntperp>
          <cntper>Sarah K Carter</cntper>
          <cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Region</cntorg>
        </cntperp>
        <cntpos>Scientist</cntpos>
        <cntaddr>
          <addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
          <address>2150 Centre Avenue Bldg C</address>
          <city>Fort Collins</city>
          <state>CO</state>
          <postal>80526</postal>
          <country>United States</country>
        </cntaddr>
        <cntvoice>970-226-9355</cntvoice>
        <cntfax>970-226-9230</cntfax>
        <cntemail>skcarter@usgs.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </metc>
    <metstdn>FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata</metstdn>
    <metstdv>FGDC-STD-001.1-1999</metstdv>
  </metainfo>
</metadata>
