A.B. Ritchie R.T. Hanson A.E. Galanter S.E. Boyce N.A. Damar Z.M. Shephard 2018 Vector Digital Data Digital hydrologic and geospatial data for the Rio Grande transboundary integrated hydrologic model and water-availability analysis, New Mexico and Texas, United States, and Northern Chihuahua, Mexico RGTIHM_SFR_Segments https://doi.org/10.5066/P9J9NYND R.T. Hanson A.B. Ritchie S.E. Boyce A.E. Galanter I.A. Ferguson L.E. Flint W.R. Henson 2018 online document U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2018–1091 https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20181091 This line vector dataset represents the Rio Grande, engineered surface-water conveyance structures (canals, laterals, drains, and wasteways), diversions to water-balance subregions (WBS), and the Las Cruces Arroyo segments simulated with the Streamflow-Routing (SFR) Package for MODFLOW-One-Water Hydrologic Flow Model in the Rio Grande Transboundary Integrated Hydrologic Model (RGTIHM). This dataset was created as part of a U.S. Geological Survey study, done in cooperation with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, to be used as input data for the Rio Grande transboundary integrated hydrologic model and water-availability analysis, New Mexico and Texas, United States, and Northern Chihuahua, Mexico. The intended uses of this dataset include, but are not limited to, natural resource modeling, mapping, and visualization applications. See the Online Guide to MODFLOW for additional SFR documentation at https://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow2000/MFDOC/index.html?sfr.htm. References Cited within this metadata document: Arcement, G.J., Jr., and Schneider, V.R., 1989, Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2339, 38 p., accessed March 6, 2017, at https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wsp2339. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), 2016, World imagery, accessed 2016, at https://services.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer. Ferguson, I.A., and Llewellyn, D., 2015, Simulation of Rio Grande Project operations in the Rincon and Mesilla Basins: Summary of model configuration and results: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Technical Memorandum No. 86-68210-2015-05, 56 p., Appendix C of Bureau of Reclamation, 2016, Continued implementation of the 2008 Operating Agreement for the Rio Grande Project, New Mexico and Texas, final environmental impact statement, accessed March 21, 2017, at https://www.usbr.gov/uc/albuq/rm/RGP/. Hanson, R.T., Schmid, W., Knight, J., and Maddock III, T., 2013, Integrated hydrologic modeling of a transboundary aquifer system - Lower Rio Grande: MODFLOW and More 2013: Translating Science into Practice, Golden, CO, June 2-6, 2013, 5 p. Humberson, Delbert, International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), written commun., December 17, 2015. S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc., 2007, Draft - Groundwater flow model for administration and management in the Lower Rio Grande Basin, November, 2007, 380 p. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2013a, USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) n32w107 1/3 arc-second 2013 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid, accessed November 23, 2015, at http://ned.usgs.gov. USGS, 2013b, USGS NED n32w108 1/3 arc-second 2013 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid, accessed November 23, 2015, at http://ned.usgs.gov. USGS, 2013c, USGS NED n33w107 1/3 arc-second 2013 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid, accessed November 23, 2015, at http://ned.usgs.gov. USGS, 2013d, USGS NED n33w108 1/3 arc-second 2013 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid, accessed November 23, 2015, at http://ned.usgs.gov. USGS, 2013e, USGS NED n34w107 1/3 arc-second 2013 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid, accessed November 23, 2015, at http://ned.usgs.gov. USGS, 2013f, USGS NED n34w108 1/3 arc-second 2013 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid, accessed November 23, 2015, at http://ned.usgs.gov. USGS, 2016, USGS NED Original Product Resolution TX RioGrand-FTWhit 2014 ArcGrid 2016: U.S. Geological Survey, accessed August 22, 2018, at https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5a54b23ee4b01e7be23e3d67. USGS, 2017, SFR - Streamflow-routing package: Online Guide to MODFLOW, accessed February 6, 2017, at https://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/modflow2000/MFDOC/index.html?sfr.htm. 2018 publication date Complete None planned -107.7 -106.1 33.2 31.3 Standard thesaurus surface water hydrology geology hydrogeology hydrostratigraphy groundwater system aquifer hydraulic properties transboundary groundwater pumping ISO 19115 Topic Category elevation geoscientificInformation inlandWaters USGS Metadata Identifier USGS:5b929d16e4b0702d0e80a0a6 Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) Rio Grande New Mexico Texas Chihuahua Las Cruces El Paso Elephant Butte Reservoir Caballo Reservoir None Acknowledgement of the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation would be appreciated in products derived from these data. Users are advised to read the metadata thoroughly to understand appropriate use and data limitations. Although this Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) compliant metadata file is intended to document the dataset in nonproprietary form, this metadata file may include some ArcGIS-specific terminology. These data are not intended to be used as a survey product and are for reference only. U.S. Geological Survey Andre B Ritchie Public Information Mailing and physical address

6700 Edith Blvd NE

Albuquerque New Mexico 87113 United States 505-830-7988 abritchie@usgs.gov Compilation of this dataset and the associated metadata was done in cooperation with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; ESRI ArcCatalog 10.3.1.4959 No formal attribute accuracy tests were conducted. Verification was done by interactive on-screen review. Frequency tests were performed on all feature class attributes to check that no features were unlabeled, misspelled, or inconsistent. The logical consistency topologically is clean. Chain-node topology is present. Dataset is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details. A formal accuracy assessment of the horizontal positional information in the dataset has not been conducted. A formal accuracy assessment of the vertical positional information in the dataset has not been conducted. The location of SFR segments was derived from previous modeling efforts (Ferguson and Llewellyn, 2015; Hanson and others, 2013; S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc., 2007), and revised to align segments with satellite imagery (ESRI, 2016). The streambed elevation of the farthest upstream and downstream reaches for each SFR segment as simulated with the RGTIHM was calculated by extracting elevations from 1-meter horizontal resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) and 10-meter horizontal resolution digital elevation model (DEM) sources. LIDAR data was collected in 2011 (Delbert Humberson, IBWC, written commun., December 17, 2015) and 2014 (USGS, 2016). The DEM was obtained from the USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) (USGS, 2013a through 2013f). The LIDAR datasets were favored over the DEM for sampling streambed elevations due to the higher horizontal spatial resolution of the LIDAR datasets (1 meter versus 10 meters), with the 2011 LIDAR dataset favored over the 2014 LIDAR dataset due to the 2011 dataset covering a greater area of the SFR network. In areas where the LIDAR datasets did not provide complete coverage of the SFR network, the DEM was used. 2016 Vector String 478 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N 0.9996 -105.0 0.0 1640416.66666667 0.0 coordinate pair 0.0001 0.0001 US foot D North American 1983 GRS 1980 6378137.0 298.257222101 RGTIHM_SFR_Segments Point Feature Class ESRI FID Internal feature number ESRI Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated Shape Feature geometry ESRI Coordinates defining the features ISEG Number of the stream segment User-defined Number thk1 Thickness of the upstream portion of the streambed, in feet, assumed to be 1 foot for all segments User-defined Number width1 Width of the upstream portion of the streambed, in feet. Width is required for segments with ICALC = 1, otherwise if ICALC = 4 the width is set as zero for this attribute. Width was assumed to be 225.33 feet for Rio Grande segments, 50 feet for Las Cruces Arroyo segments, and 10 feet for diversion to WBS segments based on satellite imagery (ESRI, 2016) ESRI (2016) and user-defined Number thk2 Thickness of the downstream portion of the streambed, in feet, assumed to be 1 foot for all segments User-defined Number width2 Width of the downstream portion of the streambed, in feet. Width is required for segments with ICALC = 1, otherwise if ICALC = 4 the width is set as zero for this attribute. Width was assumed to be 225.33 feet for Rio Grande segments, 50 feet for Las Cruces Arroyo segments, and 10 feet for diversion to WBS segments based on satellite imagery (ESRI, 2016) ESRI (2016) and user-defined Number outseg Number of the stream segment (ISEG) that can receive flow from this segment User-defined Integer upseg Number of the stream segment (ISEG) that can deliver flow to this segment User-defined Integer Mann A real number representing the Manning's Roughness Coefficient (unitless), as derived from previous modeling efforts (Ferguson and Llewellyn, 2015; Hanson and others, 2013; S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc., 2007) or assuming a minimum roughness value of 0.02 to include the largest flows possible in the rating curve (Acrement and Schneider, 1989) Acrement and Schneider (1989), Ferguson and Llewellyn (2015), Hanson and others (2013), and S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc. (2007) 0.02 Lower range of base Manning's Roughness Coefficient for stable, smooth, firm soil channels Acrement and Schneider (1989) 0.03 Upper range of base Manning's Roughness Coefficient for stable, straight uniform, firm soil channels Acrement and Schneider (1989) outseg_2 Number of the stream segment (ISEG) that can receive flow from this segment User-defined Integer upseg_2 Number of the stream segment (ISEG) that can deliver flow to this segment User-defined Integer Div_ID Unique identification that can be related to the Div_ID attribute in the RGTIHM_SFR_Diversion_Pts dataset, and the RGTIHM_SFR_Diversions and RGTIHM_SFR_Diversions_Source tabular datasets of specified diversion from the segment User-defined Text Inflw_ID Unique identification that can be related to the Inflow_ID attribute in the RGTIHM_SFR_Inflow_Pts dataset, and the RGTIHM_SFR_Inflows and RGTIHM_SFR_Inflows_Source tabular datasets of specified inflow to the segment User-defined Text ICALC Method used to calculate stream depth in the segment User-defined 1 Stream depth is calculated using Manning's equation and assuming a wide rectangular channel USGS (2017) 4 Stream depth and width are calculated using a table relating streamflow to depth and width USGS (2017) ISEG_RID Number of the stream segment (ISEG) for segments at which stream depth and width are calculated using a table relating streamflow to depth and width (i.e. ICALC = 4) User-defined Integer UpKPar A text entry that identifies the parameter used to adjust the hydraulic conductivity of the streambed for the segment during parameter estimation User-defined Text NAME Name of the segment User-defined Text ELEVUP Elevation, in feet, relative to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), of the farthest upstream reach of the segment Delbert Humberson, IBWC, written commun., December 17, 2015; USGS (2013a through 2013f); and USGS (2016) 3718.14 4355.59 ELEVDN Elevation, in feet, relative to the NAVD88, of the farthest downstream reach of the segment Delbert Humberson, IBWC, written commun., December 17, 2015; USGS (2013a through 2013f); and USGS (2016) 3717.26 4207.99 ELUPSFR Elevation, in feet, relative to the NAVD88, of the top of the streambed at the farthest upstream reach of the segment. These elevations were used to define the STRTOP parameter in the SFR, and were derived from the ELEVUP attribute by subtracting three feet. User-defined 3715.14 4352.59 ELDNSFR Elevation, in feet, relative to the NAVD88, of the top of the streambed at the farthest downstream reach of the segment. These elevations were used as the STRTOP parameter in the SFR, and were derived from the ELEVDN attribute by subtracting three feet. NULL values indicate the SFR segment was represented by only one model cell, and only the ELUPSFR attribute was used as the STRTOP parameter in the SFR. User-defined 3714.26 4204.99 RCHLEN Cumulative length of the stream channel within all model cells for each segment, in feet User-defined 31.4 94025.8 U.S. Geological Survey - ScienceBase Mailing and physical address

Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Mail Stop 302

Denver Colorado 80225 United States 1-888-275-8747 sciencebase@usgs.gov This database has been approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although this database has been subjected to rigorous review and is substantially complete, the USGS reserves the right to revise the data pursuant to further analysis and review. Furthermore, the database is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. WinZipped ESRI shapefile 10.3.1 ESRI 10.3.1 shapefile Spatial and attribute information https://doi.org/10.5066/P9J9NYND None. This dataset is provided by USGS as a public service. 20200825 U.S. Geological Survey Andre B Ritchie Public Information Mailing and physical address

6700 Edith Blvd NE

Albuquerque New Mexico 87113 United States 505-830-7988 abritchie@usgs.gov FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998