M. Tim Tinker Brian Hatfield 20160919 Vector Digital Data Set (Polygon) Annual California sea otter census 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7FJ2DWJ Tinker, M.T. Hatfield, B.B. 20160919 Publication (Other) :U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1018 Reston, VA U.S. Geological Survey http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds1018 The GIS shapefile "Census summary of southern sea otter 2016" provides a standardized tool for examining spatial patterns in abundance and demographic trends of the southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis), based on data collected during the spring 2016 range-wide census. The USGS range-wide sea otter census has been undertaken twice a year since 1982, once in May and once in October, using consistent methodology involving both ground-based and aerial-based counts. The spring census is considered more accurate than the fall count, and provides the primary basis for gauging population trends by State and Federal management agencies. This Shape file includes a series of summary statistics derived from the raw census data, including sea otter density (otters per square km of habitat), linear density (otters per km of coastline), relative pup abundance (ratio of pups to independent animals) and 5-year population trend (calculated as exponential rate of change). All statistics are calculated and plotted for small sections of habitat in order to illustrate local variation in these statistics across the entire mainland distribution of sea otters in California (as of 2016). Sea otter habitat is considered to extend offshore from the mean low tide line and out to the 60m isobath: this depth range includes over 99% of sea otter feeding dives, based on dive-depth data from radio tagged sea otters (Tinker et al 2006, 2007). Sea otter distribution in California (the mainland range) is considered to comprise this band of potential habitat stretching along the coast of California, and bounded to the north and south by range limits defined as "the points farthest from the range center at which 5 or more otters are counted within a 10km contiguous stretch of coastline (as measured along the 10m bathymetric contour) during the two most recent spring censuses, or at which these same criteria were met in the previous year". The polygon corresponding to the range definition was then sub-divided into onshore/offshore strips roughly 500 meters in width. The boundaries between these strips correspond to ATOS (As-The-Otter-Swims) points, which are arbitrary locations established approximately every 500 meters along a smoothed 5 fathom bathymetric contour (line) offshore of the State of California. The range-wide census is conducted to monitor trends in abundance of the southern sea otter, and thus provide State and Federal resource agencies with the information they need for effective management. Because the censuses represent uncorrected total counts (rather than sample-based surveys), they cannot be considered as accurate estimates of true population abundance. Instead, these data represent a valuable time-series of index counts, and provide the means of assessing spatial and temporal trends in relative abundance. The 3-year running average of the spring counts have been identified as the best index of trends and status of the population, because these averages decrease the influence of year-to-year sampling variance. The 3-year average counts are used by the US Fish and Wildlife Service in its listing determinations (de-listing or up-listing) for this legally threatened population. 1. Census Methods During each census, the entire mainland range of the sea otter in coastal California is counted by one of two methods: aerial surveys or shore-based counts. The latter method is used in all areas that are accessible by ground-based observers, except in a few regions where otters often move far off shore (such as shallow, sandy embayments) and are therefore difficult to count reliably from the shore. For the majority of the sea otter's range, however, ground surveys are practical, and are considered the more reliable means of censusing. It has been estimated that shore-based observers generally detect about 90-95% of the otters located in a given area (Estes and Jameson 1988). The ground survey area is divided into sections and each section is assigned to a team of observers. Each team consists of two individuals, a primary and secondary observer. The primary observer in every case is an individual with considerable experience counting and observing sea otters. Generally, the secondary observer has less experience than the primary, but in some cases the teams consisted of equally skilled individuals. Occasionally, small areas are counted by a single individual, but this occurs infrequently, and in every instance the individual is highly skilled with many years of experience and intimately familiar with the area to be surveyed. Each team is equipped with a high resolution 50-80X telescope and each member has binoculars (10X). Shore-based procedures are as follows: the team starts at one end of their assigned section and selects an observation point that provides good viewing of a "viewable area of habitat", which generally consists of 100-300m of coastline and all waters out to approximately 1.5 km from shore. In most cases observers use the same counting locations year after year, for consistency. The observers scan the area with unaided eye and binoculars for otters or objects that are suspected to be sea otters. Large groups and suspicious objects are scanned by the primary observer with the aid of the telescope while the secondary observer continuously scans the area with binoculars for foraging or resting otters missed during the initial scan. After having taken sufficient time (15-30 minutes) to make a thorough count of all otters within this first area of habitat, the observers move down the coast to another location that provides good viewing of the next area of habitat, contiguous with the first area. This process is continued until the entire section is counted. All sea otter observations are marked as points directly onto field maps (scale 1:6000) that show all major features of the area (including offshore rocks and kelp beds) for reference. These features allow data to be precisely placed on the maps, and reduce the chances of recounting or undercounting when the team moves to the next observation point. In addition to the otter locations, associated data recorded directly onto the maps include the following: number of independent otters, number and relative age of pups (pups are classed as either small or large depending primarily on the presence or absence of the natal pelage, but sometimes on relative size or behavior), behavior (resting, foraging, or "other"), group size, and micro-habitat type (open water, kelp, or hauled out). Time and general counting conditions are also recorded. Viewing conditions are rated from excellent to poor (coded 4 to 0). Teams are instructed to not begin surveying if conditions are "poor", or to abort the survey if conditions deteriorate to "poor". Because each team is headed by an experienced observer, it is left to that individual to determine if conditions are suitable for counting. For those portions of the range where ground counting is impossible or impractical, aerial surveys are conducted using a Partenavia PN68 "Observer" fixed-wing plane. The plane carries three observers and a pilot, and flies at an air speed of approximately 167 kilometers per hour (90 knots) at an altitude of approximately 60 meters (200 feet). Pilot and data recorder/observer occupy front seats; principal observers occupy middle seats viewing out through bubble-type viewing windows. The flight path is a predetermined track line constructed using GIS software and loaded into a GPS for the pilot to follow. Transects are oriented parallel to the coastline, with the nearshore transect line centered approximately 300 meters from shore. At survey section boundaries, the plane turns offshore, reverses direction and flies parallel to the first transect, continuing to follow pre-established tracklines on the pilot's GPS. The distance moved offshore is dependent of habitat type: transects over kelp habitat are spaced 600 meters apart (300 meter viewing area to each side of the plane), while transects over open water are spaced 800 meters apart (400 meter viewing area to each side of the plane). The survey transects are established to cover all waters within 60m of depth (30 fathoms). In some areas, such as Pismo Beach, this includes over 10 transects spaced at 800 meters. The survey track line and waypoints for otter sightings are recorded on a separate handheld GPS unit. Additional information on each sea otter sighting is recorded onto data sheets which are later transferred to a spreadsheet. The data fields include group size (with adults and pups tallied separately), observer, and viewing conditions (ranked on a 1-10 scale). 2. Data Processing Census data recorded on paper survey maps are digitized directly into a GIS system using a standard digitizing tablet. All paper survey maps have 4 geo-reference calibration points marked on them to ensure spatial accuracy. A custom GIS data capture interface program was designed for this purpose (using ESRI ArcView 3.2 software and Avenue programming language) by Brian Fulfrost, Department of Environmental Studies, UC Santa Cruz. After completing the digitizing of all survey maps from the ground-based count, all spatial data collected during the aerial survey (including waypoints and associated attribute data in spreadsheet form) are imported into the program. Rigorous error checking is then conducted to ensure that the totals for each paper survey map and each aerial survey section are consistent with the data in the GIS database. 3. Data Analysis and Summarization After raw census data have been entered into the GIS database, they are further classified by location: this is accomplished by conducting a spatial join between the census data layer and the Shape file "ATOS_polygon_teale83". The result of this join is that every sea otter sighting location is assigned to a habitat polygon (identified by the field "POLY_ID"), where each polygon represents a sub-division of the total sea otter range. The north-south boundaries between habitat polygons correspond to ATOS (As-The-Otter-Swims) points, which are arbitrary locations established approximately every 500 meters along a smoothed 5 fathom bathymetric contour (line) offshore of the State of California. Habitat polygons are further divided based on depth/distance to shore, resulting in 4 possible depth-zone categories: b = in-shore bays or sloughs; n = "nearshore" (low tide line out to the 30m depth isobath); o = "offshore" (30m isobath out to the 60m isobath or 10km from shore, whichever is closer); and w = "way offshore" (depths up to 60m but farther than 10km from shore). Having assigned survey sighting locations to habitat polygons, numbers of independent animals and pups are then summed for each polygon. To account for both temporal and spatial variability in survey conditions, and for the mobility of sea otters, these sums are smoothed temporally by taking the 3-year average for each polygon, and then spatially smoothed using a 10km "moving window" average. The smoothed data are used to calculate 4 statistics for each polygon: density (number of animals per square km), linear density (otters per km of coastline), relative pup abundance (ratio of pups to independent animals) and 5-year population trend. The last statistic is calculated by taking the natural logarithm of the 3-year average counts from the last 5 years and fitting a linear regression: the slope of this regression represents the exponential rate of change, with negative values representing local population decreases and positive values representing local population decreases. References Estes, J. A., and R. J. Jameson. 1988. A double-survey estimate for sighting probability of sea otters in California. Journal of Wildlife Management 52(1):70-76. Tinker, M. T., D. P. Costa, A. Estes James, and N. Wieringa. 2007. Individual dietary specialization and dive behaviour in the California sea otter: using archival time-depth data to detect alternative foraging strategies. Deep Sea Research II 54:330-342. Tinker, M. T., J. A. Estes, K. Ralls, T. M. Williams, D. Jessup, and D. P. Costa. 2006. Population Dynamics and Biology of the California Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) at the Southern End of its Range. MMS OCS Study 2006-007. Page 253. Coastal Research Center, Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California. MMS Cooperative Agreement Number 14-35-0001-31063. 20160417 20160511 ground condition Complete Annually -122.423222821 -120.27277221 37.2009909 34.390245722 None habitat trends sea otter census aerial counts shore counts ISO 19115 Topic Categories biota environment oceans USGS Metadata Identifier USGS:57a34e7be4b006cb45567bd0 None Central California Coast Southern California Coast Coast California None The authors of these data require that users direct any questions pertaining to appropriate use or assistance with understanding limitations and interpretation of the data to the individuals/organization listed in the Point of Contact section. US Geological Survey M. Tim Tinker Research Wildlife Biologist Mailing and Physical

COH Bldg, Long Marine Lab

100 Shaffer Road

Santa Cruz Ca 95060 831-459-2357 831-459-2249 ttinker@usgs.gov California Department of Fish and Wildlife Monterey Bay Aquarium University of California-Santa Cruz U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Environment as of Metadata Creation: Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.3.1 (Build 4959) Service Pack N/A (Build N/A) No formal attribute accuracy tests were conducted. No formal logical accuracy tests were conducted. Data set is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details. A formal accuracy assessment of the horizontal positional information in the data set has not been conducted. A formal accuracy assessment of the vertical positional information in the data set has either not been conducted, or is not applicable. Development of the data set by the agency / individuals identified in the 'Originator' element in the Identification Info section of the record. Unknown Vector G-polygon 1987 NAD 1983 California Teale Albers (ESRI Full Name: NAD_1983_California_Teale_Albers) 34.0 40.5 -120.0 0.0 0.0 -4000000.0 coordinate pair 0.6096 0.6096 Meter D_North_American_1983 GRS_1980 6378137.0 298.257222101 Attribute Table Table containing attribute information associated with the data set. Producer defined PERIMETER Perimeter length of the polygon feature (units = km) M. Tim Tinker, USGS 1.00580419025 39.068426206 km AREA Two-dimensional area encompassed by the polygon feature (units = square km) M. Tim Tinker, USGS 0.04801863653 7.92847153745 square km DEPTH Depth interval of the polygon feature (units = meters below sea level) M. Tim Tinker, USGS -30 to -60m depth interval in meters Producer defined -30 to -60m beyond 10k depth interval in meters Producer defined 0 to -30m depth interval in meters Producer defined 0 to -30m bay depth interval in meters Producer defined ATOS_ID The "As The Otter Swims" point associated with an individual polygon feature M. Tim Tinker, USGS 162 1153 HAB_ID Unique combination of the ATOS_ID and a letter that indicates the position of the polygon relative to the coast (from field ZONE_CODE) M. Tim Tinker, USGS Unique combination of the ATOS_ID and a letter that indicates the position of the polygon relative to the coast (from field ZONE_CODE) ACRES Two-dimensional area encompassed by the polygon feature (units = acres) M. Tim Tinker, USGS 11.86566349706 1959.16798371257 acres HECTARES Two-dimensional area encompassed by the polygon feature (units = hectares) M. Tim Tinker, USGS 4.80186365291 792.84715374477 hectares ZONE_CODE Depth zone of the polygon feature, delineated by a letter code: b = bay or slough, n = "nearshore" (low tide line out to the 30m depth isobath), o = "offshore" (30m isobath out to the 60m isobath or 10km from shore, whichever is closer), w = "way offshore" (depths up to 60m but farther than 10km from shore) M. Tim Tinker, USGS b bay or slough Producer defined n nearshore (low tide line out to the 30m depth isobath) Producer defined o offshore - (30m isobath out to the 60m isobath or 10km from shore, whichever is closer) Producer defined w way offshore - (depths up to 60m but farther than 10km from shore) Producer defined ZONE Depth zone of the polygon feature, delineated by a letter code: 1 = bay or slough, 2 = "nearshore" (low tide line out to the 30m depth isobath), 3 = "offshore" (30m isobath out to the 60m isobath or 10km from shore, whichever is closer), 4 = "way offshore" (depths up to 60m but farther than 10km from shore) M. Tim Tinker, USGS 1 4 Year Year that the survey was conducted M. Tim Tinker, USGS 2016 2016 year POLY_ID Unique identifier or primary key, created by combining the ATOS_ID with a letter code that indicates the position of the polygon relative to the coast M. Tim Tinker, USGS unique id dens_sm Local sea otter density, calculated as the 3-year average number of sea otters counted per square km for each polygon feature, smoothed by averaging over 10km of coastline. M. Tim Tinker, USGS 0 36.986654 number of otters per square km pupratio The ratio of pups to independent animals, calculated from 3-year average counts at each 500m interval of the coast, smoothed by averaging over 10km of coastline. M. Tim Tinker, USGS 0 0.348485 ratio of pups to independent animals lin_dens The 3-year average number of sea otters counted at each 500m interval of the coast, smoothed by averaging over 10km of coastline. M. Tim Tinker, USGS 0 12.492063 trend5yr The local rate of population change over the past 5 years, calculated as exponential growth rates fit to local population counts, and smoothed by averaging over 10km of coastline. M. Tim Tinker, USGS -0.236223 0.191731 Sect_ID Integer code that identifies the larger geographic region (referred to as a "coastline section") to which the polygon belongs. M. Tim Tinker, USGS 2 14 The entity and attribute information provided here describes the tabular data associated with the data set. Please review the detailed descriptions that are provided (the individual attribute descriptions) for information on the values that appear as fields/table entries of the data set. The entity and attribute information was generated by the individual and/or agency identified as the originator of the data set. Please review the rest of the metadata record for additional details and information. U.S. Geological Survey - ScienceBase Mailing and Physical

Denver Federal Center

Building 810

Mail Stop 302

Denver Co 80225 1-888-275-8747 sciencebase@usgs.gov Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Dataset will be available on USGS ScienceBase web site; http://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7FJ2DWJ. 20200827 US Geological Survey, WERC William Perry IT/GIS Specialist Mailing and Physical

800 Business Park Drive

Suite D

Dixon Ca 95620 530-669-5067 707-678-5039 wmperry@usgs.gov FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998 local time